HostLUSD vs CRV — price, size and safety, side by side
LUSD (Optimism) vs CRV (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
LUSD vs CRV — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| LUSD | CRV | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.02 | $0.3519 |
| Market cap | $26.02M | $552.13M |
| 24h volume | $688.59 | $130.97K |
| Liquidity | $95.76K | $414.92K |
| FDV | $109.89K | $6.89M |
| Holders | 6,714 | 29,093 |
| Age (days) | 1,566 | 1,687 |
| Safety grade | D | B |
Where they differ
- CRV measures ~21× the market cap of LUSD
- CRV measures ~4.3× the liquidity of LUSD
- CRV measures ~190× the 24h volume of LUSD
- CRV measures ~4.3× the holder count of LUSD
What the data says
LUSD
LUSD at 0xc40f949f8a4e094d1b49a23ea9241d289b7b2819 is the Optimism-bridged deployment of Liquity's USD — the dollar whose Ethereum original is famously immutable, which makes the local contract posture here the detail that matters. The September 26, 2026 snapshot prices the 110.4 thousand local units at $109.9 thousand fully diluted, inside the asset-wide $26.0 million market cap.
Unlike the governance-free Ethereum contract, this bridged deployment — 1,566 days into its record — still holds an active mint authority and new supply can be minted. Freeze authority is revoked, and it is not a proxy. The book is nearly dormant: $95.8 thousand of thin tracked depth on $689 of 24-hour volume, with 6,714 holders whose ten largest wallets hold 82.0% of supply.
CRV
CRV at 0x11cdb42b0eb46d95f990bedd4695a6e3fa034978 — Curve DAO Token — is the bridged Arbitrum deployment of the Curve protocol's governance asset, 1,687 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $552.1 million market cap towers over the $6.9 million fully-diluted figure on 19.6 million local units.
The local book is thin against the headline: $414.9 thousand of tracked depth on $291.8 thousand of 24-hour volume — a layer-two slice that moves with flow rather than holding a primary pool. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LUSD or CRV?
By tracked market cap: LUSD (Optimism) measures $26.02M and CRV (Arbitrum) measures $552.13M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LUSD or CRV?
On the contract checks we publish: LUSD (Optimism) grades D and CRV (Arbitrum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LUSD and CRV performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show LUSD at +2.02% and CRV at −1.88%.
More comparisons
WEN vs LUSDCNKT+ vs LUSDLUSD vs MIMSOLC vs LUSDCRV vs SUPERCRV vs VELVETHIMS vs CRVPRL vs CRV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.