HostLONG vs ARGUS — price, size and safety, side by side
LONG (Base) vs ARGUS (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
LONG vs ARGUS — normalized performance, 2026-09-16 to 2026-09-26T06:07:05
| LONG | ARGUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0001031 | $0.0001026 |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $18.28M | $25.82M |
| Liquidity | $5.19M | $4.98M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | 5,098 | 4,942 |
| Age (days) | 0 | 0 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
What the data says
LONG
LONG on Base — contract 0x75da26c86806c261865faa25d80333ec8ee41b07 — was brand-new at its September 26, 2026 snapshot, already carrying $5.2 million of liquidity and $18.3 million of daily volume — a 3.5x pool turnover on day zero.
Numbers that large on a same-day contract describe either a heavily backed launch (a funded team provisioning deep liquidity from the start) or the loudest volume-generation operation in this cohort — and the honest note is that both produce identical snapshot rows. The `b07` address tail matches the vanity-suffix pattern shared by the winning "OpenAI" contracts in this index, suggesting a common launch operation behind the biggest impostor/churn instruments on Base.
ARGUS
ARGUS on Base — 0x4a21564d908403009c2a1b2bd070ec4501612b07 — carries a name shared by several unrelated projects across chains, which is itself the first thing to verify: the address above is the only identity this page tracks, and ARGUS tokens at other contracts are different assets.
The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $5.0 million of tracked liquidity with roughly $25.8 million of 24-hour volume — a turnover multiple near 5x, among the hottest in this index slice. Volume cycling at five times the pool daily is the signature of active two-way speculation; it says the market is trading it hard, and nothing about whether it should be.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LONG or ARGUS?
By tracked market cap: LONG (Base) measures — and ARGUS (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LONG or ARGUS?
On the contract checks we publish: LONG (Base) grades A and ARGUS (Base) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LONG and ARGUS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-16 and 2026-09-26T06:07:05, the measured snapshots show LONG at 0.00% and ARGUS at 0.00%.
More comparisons
MU vs LONGLONG vs ONYCZEC vs LONGLONG vs POPCATPENGU vs ARGUSARGUS vs ANTHROPICARGUS vs METSLC vs ARGUS
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-16→2026-09-26T06:07:05; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.