HostLONG vs 孙宇晨奖 — price, size and safety, side by side
LONG (Base) vs 孙宇晨奖 (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
LONG vs 孙宇晨奖 — normalized performance, 2026-09-16 to 2026-09-26T06:07:05
| LONG | 孙宇晨奖 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0001031 | $0.0001013 |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $18.28M | $17.48M |
| Liquidity | $5.19M | $4.90M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | 5,098 | 4,451 |
| Age (days) | 0 | 0 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
What the data says
LONG
LONG on Base — contract 0x75da26c86806c261865faa25d80333ec8ee41b07 — was brand-new at its September 26, 2026 snapshot, already carrying $5.2 million of liquidity and $18.3 million of daily volume — a 3.5x pool turnover on day zero.
Numbers that large on a same-day contract describe either a heavily backed launch (a funded team provisioning deep liquidity from the start) or the loudest volume-generation operation in this cohort — and the honest note is that both produce identical snapshot rows. The `b07` address tail matches the vanity-suffix pattern shared by the winning "OpenAI" contracts in this index, suggesting a common launch operation behind the biggest impostor/churn instruments on Base.
孙宇晨奖
孙宇晨奖 on Base — 0x2704da20f48b486b9e047e15d2a71ed9fdcc4b07 — carries a Chinese name translating to "Justin Sun Award", tying itself to the Tron founder's persona. Celebrity-adjacent naming is one of the oldest attention plays in the genre: the name buys recognition, and recognition buys exit liquidity.
The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $4.9 million of liquidity with roughly $17.5 million of daily volume — turnover near 3.6x, hot but inside the normal momentum band rather than the mirrored-clone extremes. There is no indication of any connection to Justin Sun or Tron; the name is a theme, not a claim of affiliation.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LONG or 孙宇晨奖?
By tracked market cap: LONG (Base) measures — and 孙宇晨奖 (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LONG or 孙宇晨奖?
On the contract checks we publish: LONG (Base) grades A and 孙宇晨奖 (Base) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LONG and 孙宇晨奖 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-16 and 2026-09-26T06:07:05, the measured snapshots show LONG at 0.00% and 孙宇晨奖 at 0.00%.
More comparisons
MU vs LONGLONG vs ONYCZEC vs LONGLONG vs POPCATENA vs 孙宇晨奖孙宇晨奖 vs BASE孙宇晨奖 vs SPYXMET vs 孙宇晨奖
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-16→2026-09-26T06:07:05; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.