HostLINK vs VSN — price, size and safety, side by side
LINK (Ethereum) vs VSN (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
LINK vs VSN — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| LINK | VSN | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $14.30 | $0.04384 |
| Market cap | $9.76B | $166.29M |
| 24h volume | $2.58M | $61.37K |
| Liquidity | $24.03M | $909.27K |
| FDV | $13.05B | $4.49M |
| Holders | 919,439 | 43,114 |
| Age (days) | 1,727 | 314 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- LINK measures ~59× the market cap of VSN
- LINK measures ~26× the liquidity of VSN
- LINK measures ~42× the 24h volume of VSN
- LINK measures ~21× the holder count of VSN
- over the shared window LINK moved +10.3% while VSN moved +0.60%
What the data says
LINK
LINK is Chainlink's token — the asset that pays the oracle network most of DeFi runs on, making it one of the few crypto tokens tied to infrastructure the market actually uses every block. The deployment 0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca is the canonical mint; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $24.0 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — a fraction of a float spread across every venue that lists it.
The honest shape: LINK's value thesis is payment for oracle services plus stake in the network's security model, so it carries a real-usage floor most tokens lack — and a valuation that has always run ahead of the fees the network actually collects. It is infrastructure exposure, not a cashflow claim, and the gap between "most-used oracle" and "token captures that usage" is the open question its holders are betting on.
VSN
VSN at 0x6fbbbd8bfb1cd3986b1d05e7861a0f62f87db74b — Vision — is an Arbitrum asset 314 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $166.3 million market cap dwarfs the $4.5 million fully-diluted figure priced on the 101.2 million local units — the familiar shape where the headline valuation lives on another venue while this chain carries a slice.
The local book is thin against that headline: $909.3 thousand of tracked depth on $38.5 thousand of daily volume — a quiet book that does its real clearing elsewhere. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot; the authority posture is a live-scan question.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LINK or VSN?
By tracked market cap: LINK (Ethereum) measures $9.76B and VSN (Arbitrum) measures $166.29M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LINK or VSN?
On the contract checks we publish: LINK (Ethereum) grades A and VSN (Arbitrum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LINK and VSN performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show LINK at +10.3% and VSN at +0.60%.
More comparisons
LINK vs USD1ETH vs LINKSUSDE vs LINKLINK vs AAVEUSDT0 vs VSNFWA vs VSNVSN vs UPPPOLY vs VSN
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.