HostLINK vs PEAR — price, size and safety, side by side
LINK (Ethereum) vs PEAR (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
LINK vs PEAR — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| LINK | PEAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $14.30 | $0.03808 |
| Market cap | $9.76B | $19.57M |
| 24h volume | $2.58M | $90.37K |
| Liquidity | $24.03M | $714.58K |
| FDV | $13.05B | $32.45M |
| Holders | 919,439 | 2,400 |
| Age (days) | 1,727 | 725 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- LINK measures ~499× the market cap of PEAR
- LINK measures ~34× the liquidity of PEAR
- LINK measures ~29× the 24h volume of PEAR
- LINK measures ~383× the holder count of PEAR
What the data says
LINK
LINK is Chainlink's token — the asset that pays the oracle network most of DeFi runs on, making it one of the few crypto tokens tied to infrastructure the market actually uses every block. The deployment 0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca is the canonical mint; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $24.0 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — a fraction of a float spread across every venue that lists it.
The honest shape: LINK's value thesis is payment for oracle services plus stake in the network's security model, so it carries a real-usage floor most tokens lack — and a valuation that has always run ahead of the fees the network actually collects. It is infrastructure exposure, not a cashflow claim, and the gap between "most-used oracle" and "token captures that usage" is the open question its holders are betting on.
PEAR
PEAR at 0x3212dc0f8c834e4de893532d27cc9b6001684db0 is an Arbitrum asset 725 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $19.6 million market cap with a $32.5 million fully-diluted figure on 852.2 million units showing the emission still ahead.
The book is workable for the cap: $714.6 thousand of tracked depth on $58.0 thousand of 24-hour volume — a pool that clears ordinary size and a quiet tape that mostly holds. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot, so the authority posture is a live-scan question rather than an assumption here.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LINK or PEAR?
By tracked market cap: LINK (Ethereum) measures $9.76B and PEAR (Arbitrum) measures $19.57M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LINK or PEAR?
On the contract checks we publish: LINK (Ethereum) grades A and PEAR (Arbitrum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LINK and PEAR performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show LINK at +10.3% and PEAR at +9.20%.
More comparisons
LINK vs USD1ETH vs LINKSUSDE vs LINKLINK vs AAVEPEAR vs GMEPEAR vs DESPXAPEAR vs LFIAVA vs PEAR
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.