HostLINK vs KOMA — price, size and safety, side by side
LINK (Ethereum) vs KOMA (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
LINK vs KOMA — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| LINK | KOMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $14.30 | $0.01958 |
| Market cap | $9.76B | $13.13M |
| 24h volume | $2.58M | $1.26M |
| Liquidity | $24.03M | $1.55M |
| FDV | $13.05B | $13.13M |
| Holders | 919,439 | 56,148 |
| Age (days) | 1,727 | 715 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- LINK measures ~743× the market cap of KOMA
- LINK measures ~15× the liquidity of KOMA
- LINK measures ~2.0× the 24h volume of KOMA
- LINK measures ~16× the holder count of KOMA
- over the shared window LINK moved +10.3% while KOMA moved −9.65%
What the data says
LINK
LINK is Chainlink's token — the asset that pays the oracle network most of DeFi runs on, making it one of the few crypto tokens tied to infrastructure the market actually uses every block. The deployment 0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca is the canonical mint; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $24.0 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — a fraction of a float spread across every venue that lists it.
The honest shape: LINK's value thesis is payment for oracle services plus stake in the network's security model, so it carries a real-usage floor most tokens lack — and a valuation that has always run ahead of the fees the network actually collects. It is infrastructure exposure, not a cashflow claim, and the gap between "most-used oracle" and "token captures that usage" is the open question its holders are betting on.
KOMA
KOMA at 0xd5eaaac47bd1993d661bc087e15dfb079a7f3c19 — Koma Inu — is a BNB Chain community token with a real history: 715 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot and priced at a $13.1 million market cap across a 1.0 billion supply.
The book is stronger than the dog-token average: $1.6 million of deep tracked depth on $1.3 million of 24-hour volume — a pool nearly an eighth of the cap that cycles most of itself daily, a tape with real use rather than a dormant listing. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot, so the authority posture is a live-scan question.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LINK or KOMA?
By tracked market cap: LINK (Ethereum) measures $9.76B and KOMA (BNB Chain) measures $13.13M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LINK or KOMA?
On the contract checks we publish: LINK (Ethereum) grades A and KOMA (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LINK and KOMA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show LINK at +10.3% and KOMA at −9.65%.
More comparisons
LINK vs USD1ETH vs LINKSUSDE vs LINKLINK vs AAVEKOMA vs GSTOCKBAN vs KOMAKOMA vs YZYUSDS vs KOMA
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.