HostLINK vs GEOD — price, size and safety, side by side
LINK (Ethereum) vs GEOD (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
LINK vs GEOD — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| LINK | GEOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $14.30 | $0.2657 |
| Market cap | $9.76B | $122.83M |
| 24h volume | $2.58M | $243.54K |
| Liquidity | $24.03M | $803.11K |
| FDV | $13.05B | $255.41M |
| Holders | 919,439 | 16,751 |
| Age (days) | 1,727 | 1,198 |
| Safety grade | A | C |
Where they differ
- LINK measures ~79× the market cap of GEOD
- LINK measures ~30× the liquidity of GEOD
- LINK measures ~11× the 24h volume of GEOD
- LINK measures ~55× the holder count of GEOD
- over the shared window LINK moved +10.3% while GEOD moved +3.49%
What the data says
LINK
LINK is Chainlink's token — the asset that pays the oracle network most of DeFi runs on, making it one of the few crypto tokens tied to infrastructure the market actually uses every block. The deployment 0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca is the canonical mint; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $24.0 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — a fraction of a float spread across every venue that lists it.
The honest shape: LINK's value thesis is payment for oracle services plus stake in the network's security model, so it carries a real-usage floor most tokens lack — and a valuation that has always run ahead of the fees the network actually collects. It is infrastructure exposure, not a cashflow claim, and the gap between "most-used oracle" and "token captures that usage" is the open question its holders are betting on.
GEOD
GEOD at 0xac0f66379a6d7801d7726d5a943356a172549adb — the Geodnet Token — is the DePIN asset of a decentralized GPS-correction network, 1,198 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The $122.8 million market cap sits against a $255.4 million fully-diluted figure on 1.0 billion units — under half the supply is the priced float.
The exit book is thin against the nine-figure cap: $803.1 thousand of tracked depth on $112.7 thousand of 24-hour volume — a held-token profile where the real distribution happens through network rewards rather than the pool. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LINK or GEOD?
By tracked market cap: LINK (Ethereum) measures $9.76B and GEOD (Polygon) measures $122.83M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LINK or GEOD?
On the contract checks we publish: LINK (Ethereum) grades A and GEOD (Polygon) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LINK and GEOD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show LINK at +10.3% and GEOD at +3.49%.
More comparisons
LINK vs USD1ETH vs LINKSUSDE vs LINKLINK vs AAVEACT vs GEODGEOD vs EUROCIDL vs GEODCOAI vs GEOD
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.