HostLINK vs FELY — price, size and safety, side by side
LINK (Ethereum) vs FELY (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-13 / 2026-11-15.
LINK vs FELY — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-13T12:15:58
| LINK | FELY | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $9.97 | $0.4504 |
| Market cap | $8.23B | $19.96M |
| 24h volume | $370.50M all venues | $1.20M all venues |
| Liquidity | $21.04M | $668.07K |
| FDV | $10.74B | $228.00M |
| Holders | 922,570 | 10,647 |
| Age (days) | 1,745 | 676 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- LINK measures ~413× the market cap of FELY
- LINK measures ~31× the liquidity of FELY
- LINK measures ~310× the 24h volume of FELY
- LINK measures ~87× the holder count of FELY
- over the shared window LINK moved −23.1% while FELY moved +11.0%
What the data says
LINK
LINK is Chainlink's token — the asset that pays the oracle network most of DeFi runs on, making it one of the few crypto tokens tied to infrastructure the market actually uses every block. The deployment 0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca is the canonical mint; our November 6, 2026 snapshot reads $21.0 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — a fraction of a float spread across every venue that lists it.
The honest shape: LINK's value thesis is payment for oracle services plus stake in the network's security model, so it carries a real-usage floor most tokens lack — and a valuation that has always run ahead of the fees the network actually collects. It is infrastructure exposure, not a cashflow claim, and the gap between "most-used oracle" and "token captures that usage" is the open question its holders are betting on.
FELY
FELY at 0xee997788f625809332baabb3110bcf1ba7400824 — Felysyum — is a Polygon asset 661 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $20.0 million market cap against a $228.0 million fully-diluted figure on 500.0 million units — one of the widest cap-to-FDV gaps in this index, meaning the overwhelming majority of supply has yet to emit.
The contract read is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy — with the creator wallet holding a modest 0.78% of supply. Against that, the ten largest wallets hold 95.5%: a fixed contract over a deeply concentrated book. 10,647 holders share the remainder, and $668.1 thousand of workable tracked depth sees $75.9 thousand of daily volume.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LINK or FELY?
By tracked market cap: LINK (Ethereum) measures $8.23B and FELY (Polygon) measures $19.96M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LINK or FELY?
On the contract checks we publish: LINK (Ethereum) grades A and FELY (Polygon) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LINK and FELY performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-13T12:15:58, the measured snapshots show LINK at −23.1% and FELY at +11.0%.
More comparisons
LINK vs CIRBTCLINK vs SUSDELINK vs VVVLINK vs PAXGUSDC.E vs FELYFELY vs HLXTBTC vs FELYUSD₮0 vs FELY
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-13T12:15:58; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.