HostLGNS vs WPOL — price, size and safety, side by side
LGNS (Polygon) vs WPOL (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
LGNS vs WPOL — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| LGNS | WPOL | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.07 | $0.1211 |
| Market cap | — | $22.12M |
| 24h volume | $7.32M | $8.14M |
| Liquidity | $50.25M | $7.27M |
| FDV | $7.04B | $22.15M |
| Holders | 2,547,218 | 843,463 |
| Age (days) | 929 | 1,687 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- LGNS measures ~6.9× the liquidity of WPOL
- LGNS measures ~3.0× the holder count of WPOL
- over the shared window LGNS moved −5.33% while WPOL moved +8.33%
What the data says
LGNS
Longinus (LGNS) is a Polygon token at 0xeb51d9a39ad5eef215dc0bf39a8821ff804a0f01, 929 days old at this snapshot dated September 27, 2026 — one of the older contracts the index tracks on the chain.
The row shows $50.3 million of tracked liquidity with $6.7 million traded in the last day across a supply of 6.3 billion tokens — a deep, active market by the numbers this index measured.
WPOL
WPOL at 0x0d500b1d8e8ef31e21c99d1db9a6444d3adf1270 is the gas token's wrapped twin — the ERC-20 face of POL on its own chain, the contract long-timers knew as WMATIC before the token migration renamed what it wraps. One POL in, one WPOL out; the wrapper exists because DeFi needs an ERC-20 and the gas token is not one.
The September 27, 2026 snapshot is as clean as this index prints: the contract cannot mint new supply, cannot freeze balances, and is not a proxy — grade A, on a wrapper whose entire job is to be boring. 843,463 wallets hold it; the market cap reads $22.1 million across 206.7 million wrapped units, and $7.3 million of tracked depth is deep for that size. Daily turnover of $16.1 million is the sound of plumbing doing work — a gas wrapper trades constantly because everything routes through it.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LGNS or WPOL?
By tracked market cap: LGNS (Polygon) measures — and WPOL (Polygon) measures $22.12M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LGNS or WPOL?
On the contract checks we publish: LGNS (Polygon) grades B and WPOL (Polygon) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LGNS and WPOL performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show LGNS at −5.33% and WPOL at +8.33%.
More comparisons
WSTETH vs LGNSLGNS vs ETHLGNS vs GHSTLGNS vs RLUSDSPX vs WPOLWPOL vs WIFWPOL vs FARTCOINCASH vs WPOL
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.