HostLGNS vs WPOL — price, size and safety, side by side
LGNS (Polygon) vs WPOL (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-15.
LGNS vs WPOL — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-15T15:15:30
| LGNS | WPOL | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.162 | $0.08061 |
| Market cap | — | $14.69M |
| 24h volume | $748.44K DEX | $8.36M all venues |
| Liquidity | $8.38M | $6.23M |
| FDV | $1.27B | $14.59M |
| Holders | 2,542,238 | 843,296 |
| Age (days) | 947 | 1,687 |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- WPOL measures ~11× the 24h volume of LGNS
- LGNS measures ~3.0× the holder count of WPOL
- over the shared window LGNS moved −85.6% while WPOL moved −27.9%
What the data says
LGNS
Longinus (LGNS) is a Polygon token at 0xeb51d9a39ad5eef215dc0bf39a8821ff804a0f01, 929 days old at this snapshot dated November 4, 2026 — one of the older contracts the index tracks on the chain.
The row shows $8.4 million of tracked liquidity with $6.7 million traded in the last day across a supply of 6.3 billion tokens — a deep, active market by the numbers this index measured.
WPOL
WPOL at 0x0d500b1d8e8ef31e21c99d1db9a6444d3adf1270 is the gas token's wrapped twin — the ERC-20 face of POL on its own chain, the contract long-timers knew as WMATIC before the token migration renamed what it wraps. One POL in, one WPOL out; the wrapper exists because DeFi needs an ERC-20 and the gas token is not one.
The November 6, 2026 snapshot is as clean as this index prints: the contract cannot mint new supply, cannot freeze balances, and is not a proxy — grade A, on a wrapper whose entire job is to be boring. 843,296 wallets hold it; the market cap reads $14.7 million across 206.7 million wrapped units, and $6.2 million of tracked depth is deep for that size. Daily turnover of $16.1 million is the sound of plumbing doing work — a gas wrapper trades constantly because everything routes through it.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LGNS or WPOL?
By tracked market cap: LGNS (Polygon) measures — and WPOL (Polygon) measures $14.69M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LGNS or WPOL?
On the contract checks we publish: LGNS (Polygon) grades C and WPOL (Polygon) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LGNS and WPOL performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-15T15:15:30, the measured snapshots show LGNS at −85.6% and WPOL at −27.9%.
More comparisons
LGNS vs SKYLGNS vs KBTCSUSDAI vs LGNSLGNS vs USDCWPOL vs EUROCWPOL vs ENAWPOL vs AEROUSDC vs WPOL
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-15T15:15:30; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.