HostLGNS vs WBTC — price, size and safety, side by side
LGNS (Polygon) vs WBTC (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-13.
LGNS vs WBTC — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-13T12:15:58
| LGNS | WBTC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.162 | $68.04K |
| Market cap | — | $8.82B |
| 24h volume | $748.44K DEX | $456.69M all venues |
| Liquidity | $8.38M | $188.50M |
| FDV | $1.27B | $8.82B |
| Holders | 2,542,238 | 197,266 |
| Age (days) | 947 | 1,583 |
| Safety grade | C | C |
Where they differ
- WBTC measures ~22× the liquidity of LGNS
- WBTC measures ~610× the 24h volume of LGNS
- LGNS measures ~13× the holder count of WBTC
- over the shared window LGNS moved −85.6% while WBTC moved −19.0%
What the data says
LGNS
Longinus (LGNS) is a Polygon token at 0xeb51d9a39ad5eef215dc0bf39a8821ff804a0f01, 929 days old at this snapshot dated November 4, 2026 — one of the older contracts the index tracks on the chain.
The row shows $8.4 million of tracked liquidity with $6.7 million traded in the last day across a supply of 6.3 billion tokens — a deep, active market by the numbers this index measured.
WBTC
WBTC is the original wrapped Bitcoin — the ERC-20 that put BTC on Ethereum's DeFi rails in 2019, custodied by BitGo with a mint-and-burn pipeline run through KYC'd merchants. The deployment 0x2260fac5e5542a773aa44fbcfedf7c193bc2c599 is the canonical mint, one of the oldest contract addresses in DeFi; our November 6, 2026 snapshot reads $188.5 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — a slice of a float that spans every major venue.
The honest frame is unchanged since launch: holding WBTC means trusting BitGo's custody — the reserve is attested and the mint pipeline is transparent, but the claim is institutional, not cryptographic. Coinbase's cbBTC arrived as the regulated-competitor answer; the two trade the same BTC exposure with different custodians, and the depth split between them is the market's live verdict on whose custody it prefers.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LGNS or WBTC?
By tracked market cap: LGNS (Polygon) measures — and WBTC (Ethereum) measures $8.82B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LGNS or WBTC?
On the contract checks we publish: LGNS (Polygon) grades C and WBTC (Ethereum) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LGNS and WBTC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-13T12:15:58, the measured snapshots show LGNS at −85.6% and WBTC at −19.0%.
More comparisons
LGNS vs SKYLGNS vs KBTCSUSDAI vs LGNSLGNS vs USDCWBTC vs CBBTCWBTC vs USDSWBTC vs STETHWBTC vs PYUSD
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-13T12:15:58; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.