NexLFI vs PLAY — price, size and safety, side by side
LFI (Base) vs PLAY (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-14 / 2026-11-07.
LFI vs PLAY — normalized performance, 2026-09-26 to 2026-11-07T18:16:33
| LFI | PLAY | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00003505 | $0.0109 |
| Market cap | $2.99M | $4.66M |
| 24h volume | $363.58K all venues | $2.13M all venues |
| Liquidity | $236.96K | $192.40K |
| FDV | $4.74M | $49.92M |
| Holders | 10,497 | 6,454 |
| Age (days) | 108 | 140 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- PLAY measures ~1.6× the market cap of LFI
- PLAY measures ~5.9× the 24h volume of LFI
- LFI measures ~1.6× the holder count of PLAY
- over the shared window LFI moved −41.0% while PLAY moved −65.1%
What the data says
LFI
LFI — LienFi on Base, 0x3722264ab15a1dfce5a5af89e6547f7949a8aba3 — is a 108-day-old token holding $237 thousand of liquidity in the November 6, 2026 snapshot, against roughly $867 thousand of daily volume.
The ratio here is the calmer profile in the cohort: turnover near 1.2x the pool is an ordinary active market — trades happen, the pool isn't being churned through industrial flow. At three-plus months, LFI sits past the disposable-launch window; the name suggests a DeFi lending theme, but this row carries no project metadata to test the claim against.
PLAY
PLAY at 0x853a7c99227499dba9db8c3a02aa691afdebf841 is a Base asset 140 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot. The $4.7 million market cap prices under a tenth of the $49.9 million fully-diluted figure on 5.0 billion units — the emission overhang dominates this book's shape.
The book is workable and the tape is hot: $192.4 thousand of tracked depth on $1.1 million of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling itself several times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LFI or PLAY?
By tracked market cap: LFI (Base) measures $2.99M and PLAY (Base) measures $4.66M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LFI or PLAY?
On the contract checks we publish: LFI (Base) grades A and PLAY (Base) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LFI and PLAY performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-26 and 2026-11-07T18:16:33, the measured snapshots show LFI at −41.0% and PLAY at −65.1%.
More comparisons
LFI vs ICPLFI vs SOLVBTCLFI vs UVMLFI vs AAVE.ERENDER vs PLAYAAVE.E vs PLAYPLAY vs GRASSUVM vs PLAY
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-26→2026-11-07T18:16:33; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.