NexLAVA vs CRV — price, size and safety, side by side
LAVA (Arbitrum) vs CRV (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-14 / 2026-11-12.
LAVA vs CRV — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-11-12T21:16:22
| LAVA | CRV | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.01621 | $0.2376 |
| Market cap | $9.56M | $416.06M |
| 24h volume | $511.05K all venues | $47.95M all venues |
| Liquidity | $355.55K | $8.70M |
| FDV | $3.11M | $638.63M |
| Holders | 4,745 | 101,017 |
| Age (days) | 286 | 1,105 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- CRV measures ~44× the market cap of LAVA
- CRV measures ~24× the liquidity of LAVA
- CRV measures ~94× the 24h volume of LAVA
- CRV measures ~21× the holder count of LAVA
- over the shared window LAVA moved +17.2% while CRV moved −30.9%
What the data says
LAVA
LAVA at 0x11e969e9b3f89cb16d686a03cd8508c9fc0361af is an Arbitrum deployment of the Lava Network token, 286 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $9.6 million market cap sits above the $3.1 million fully-diluted figure priced on 203.4 million local units.
The local book is workable against the slice: $355.5 thousand of tracked depth on $23.3 thousand of 24-hour volume — a pool that can take exits and a quiet tape that mostly holds. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
CRV
CRV — Curve DAO Token at 0xd533a949740bb3306d119cc777fa900ba034cd52 — is the governance and incentive token of Curve, the stable-swap AMM that carries a meaningful share of all stablecoin and LST volume on Ethereum. This is a six-year-old protocol token, not a launch, and the honest risks are the ones an established protocol token actually runs: governance economics, emissions, and founder concentration — not honeypot mechanics.
The November 6, 2026 snapshot reads a $416.1 million market cap against an $638.6 million fully-diluted value — roughly two-thirds of eventual supply circulating — with $8.7 million of tracked pool depth and 101,017 holders. Depth at that scale is a real exit book for a retail position.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LAVA or CRV?
By tracked market cap: LAVA (Arbitrum) measures $9.56M and CRV (Ethereum) measures $416.06M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LAVA or CRV?
On the contract checks we publish: LAVA (Arbitrum) grades C and CRV (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LAVA and CRV performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-11-12T21:16:22, the measured snapshots show LAVA at +17.2% and CRV at −30.9%.
More comparisons
LAVA vs GOHOMELAVA vs VIRTUALMON vs LAVAPYTH vs LAVACRV vs SKYSUSDAI vs CRVUSDTB vs CRVCRV vs KBTC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-11-12T21:16:22; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.