HostLAB vs GUA — price, size and safety, side by side
LAB (BNB Chain) vs GUA (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
LAB vs GUA — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| LAB | GUA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.06048 | $0.03606 |
| Market cap | $41.44M | $1.52M |
| 24h volume | $1.69M | $973.63K |
| Liquidity | $590.43K | $557.44K |
| FDV | $53.09M | $33.59M |
| Holders | 33,502 | 16,688 |
| Age (days) | 343 | 299 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- LAB measures ~27× the market cap of GUA
- LAB measures ~1.7× the 24h volume of GUA
- LAB measures ~2.0× the holder count of GUA
- over the shared window LAB moved +12.8% while GUA moved +6.54%
What the data says
LAB
LAB at 0x7ec43cf65f1663f820427c62a5780b8f2e25593a is a BNB Chain token 343 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, carrying 33,502 holders around a $41.4 million market cap — with a $53.1 million fully-diluted figure on 990.0 million units showing the supply still ahead.
The contract posture is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy — the full clean set. Distribution is the counterweight worth pricing: the ten largest wallets hold 62.8% of supply, a top-weighted bracket on an otherwise broad holder book. $590.4 thousand of workable tracked depth sees $1.7 million of 24-hour volume — a tape that turns over well beyond the pool, the signature of an actively routed asset.
GUA
GUA at 0xa5c8e1513b6a08334b479fe4d71f1253259469be is a 299-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $1.5 million market cap against a $33.6 million fully-diluted figure on 1.0 billion units at the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
The book is deep against the small cap: $557.4 thousand of tracked depth on $973.6 thousand of 24-hour volume — a pool holding a third of the cap with a working tape. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LAB or GUA?
By tracked market cap: LAB (BNB Chain) measures $41.44M and GUA (BNB Chain) measures $1.52M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LAB or GUA?
On the contract checks we publish: LAB (BNB Chain) grades A and GUA (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LAB and GUA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show LAB at +12.8% and GUA at +6.54%.
More comparisons
WOO vs LABMSETH vs LABLAB vs DAICOLLECT vs LABSPCXC vs GUACYS vs GUAGUA vs HANAGUA vs TAO
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.