NexLAB vs CROSS — price, size and safety, side by side
LAB (BNB Chain) vs CROSS (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-10 / 2026-11-15.
LAB vs CROSS — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-10T21:13:10
| LAB | CROSS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0411 | $0.1081 |
| Market cap | $34.69M | $58.05M |
| 24h volume | $11.86M all venues | $3.52M all venues |
| Liquidity | $556.52K | $526.40K |
| FDV | $44.28M | $103.50M |
| Holders | — | 80,010 |
| Age (days) | 361 | 447 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- CROSS measures ~1.7× the market cap of LAB
- LAB measures ~3.4× the 24h volume of CROSS
- over the shared window LAB moved −23.4% while CROSS moved −34.1%
What the data says
LAB
LAB at 0x7ec43cf65f1663f820427c62a5780b8f2e25593a is a BNB Chain token 343 days into its record at the September 21, 2026 snapshot, carrying 33,502 holders around a $41.4 million market cap — with a $53.1 million fully-diluted figure on 990.0 million units showing the supply still ahead.
The contract posture is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy — the full clean set. Distribution is the counterweight worth pricing: the ten largest wallets hold 62.8% of supply, a top-weighted bracket on an otherwise broad holder book. $590.4 thousand of workable tracked depth sees $1.7 million of 24-hour volume — a tape that turns over well beyond the pool, the signature of an actively routed asset.
CROSS
CROSS at 0x6bf62ca91e397b5a7d1d6bce97d9092065d7a510 is a 447-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $58.0 million market cap against a $103.5 million fully-diluted figure on 1.0 billion units at the November 6, 2026 snapshot.
The book is thin for the cap and the tape is loud: $526.4 thousand of tracked depth on $3.1 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool five times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LAB or CROSS?
By tracked market cap: LAB (BNB Chain) measures $34.69M and CROSS (BNB Chain) measures $58.05M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LAB or CROSS?
On the contract checks we publish: LAB (BNB Chain) grades B and CROSS (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LAB and CROSS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-10T21:13:10, the measured snapshots show LAB at −23.4% and CROSS at −34.1%.
More comparisons
FET vs LABWBTC vs LABHLX vs LABLAB vs STABLECROSS vs STABLEFET vs CROSSWBTC vs CROSSHLX vs CROSS
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-10T21:13:10; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.