NexJCT vs AEON — price, size and safety, side by side
JCT (BNB Chain) vs AEON (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-11 / 2026-11-10.
JCT vs AEON — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-11-09T21:16:00
| JCT | AEON | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.005837 | $0.02383 |
| Market cap | $34.54M | $5.55M |
| 24h volume | $45.56M all venues | $3.63M all venues |
| Liquidity | $419.66K | $386.43K |
| FDV | $30.98M | $22.57M |
| Holders | 15,153 | 52,214 |
| Age (days) | 128 | 75 |
| Safety grade | B | D |
Where they differ
- JCT measures ~6.2× the market cap of AEON
- JCT measures ~13× the 24h volume of AEON
- AEON measures ~3.4× the holder count of JCT
- over the shared window JCT moved +342% while AEON moved −64.0%
What the data says
JCT
One detail on JCT didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So it's best treated as unconfirmed rather than assumed clean, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
Market-wise, JCT carries a $348.83K pool, a holder base of 15,153 and a maturing 128-day history as of 2026-10-09. Against a market cap of about $29.20M, the $348.83K pool is workable rather than deep — fine for ordinary size to move in and out, though a larger position would start to feel the pool's edges. The 15,153-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of JCT as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
AEON
AEON on BNB Chain at 0x277add739c6e0477616948357af9e79fe1ec9b80 is 57 days old at the November 6, 2026 snapshot, and it carries the weakest contract posture in this batch: the snapshot's assessor measures minting as still possible — new supply can be minted — freeze controls still active — balances can be frozen — and a contract owner that is present but hidden. That is the combination this index was built to surface, and the grade lands at D because of it.
The market side reads better than the contract side: $5.5 million of market cap against $22.6 million fully diluted on a 1.0 billion supply, $386.4 thousand of tracked depth that is deep relative to the cap, 52,214 holders, and $1.4 million of 24-hour volume. The ten largest wallets hold 88.4% of supply.
FAQ
Which is bigger, JCT or AEON?
By tracked market cap: JCT (BNB Chain) measures $34.54M and AEON (BNB Chain) measures $5.55M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, JCT or AEON?
On the contract checks we publish: JCT (BNB Chain) grades B and AEON (BNB Chain) grades D. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have JCT and AEON performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-11-09T21:16:00, the measured snapshots show JCT at +342% and AEON at −64.0%.
More comparisons
JCT vs MONPYTH vs JCTSTABLE vs JCTJCT vs CRVMON vs AEONAEON vs CRVPYTH vs AEONAEON vs GOHOME
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-11-09T21:16:00; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.