HostJCT vs 果蝇 — price, size and safety, side by side
JCT (BNB Chain) vs 果蝇 (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-30 / 2026-10-31.
JCT vs 果蝇 — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-30T18:16:02
| JCT | 果蝇 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.005883 | $0.000000000000 |
| Market cap | $29.20M | $7.83K |
| 24h volume | $10.94M DEX | $1.35M DEX |
| Liquidity | $348.83K | $345.10K |
| FDV | $26.19M | $26.24M |
| Holders | 15,153 | 1,815,204 |
| Age (days) | 128 | 5 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- JCT measures ~3,730× the market cap of 果蝇
- JCT measures ~8.1× the 24h volume of 果蝇
- 果蝇 measures ~120× the holder count of JCT
- over the shared window JCT moved +134% while 果蝇 moved 0.00%
What the data says
JCT
One detail on JCT didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So it's best treated as unconfirmed rather than assumed clean, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
Market-wise, JCT carries a $348.83K pool, a holder base of 15,153 and a maturing 128-day history as of 2026-10-09. Against a market cap of about $29.20M, the $348.83K pool is workable rather than deep — fine for ordinary size to move in and out, though a larger position would start to feel the pool's edges. The 15,153-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of JCT as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
果蝇
果蝇 — "fruit fly" in Chinese — at 0x209e487f1c2637ddf1f1b3f7d88a19068626b70b is a five-day-old BNB Chain deployment whose headline number demands a second look: 1,815,204 recorded wallets against a market cap of $7.8 thousand and a fully diluted figure of $26.2 million on the October 6, 2026 snapshot.
A holder count that large against a four-figure valuation is the signature of an airdrop-shaped distribution — dust scattered across hundreds of thousands of addresses, not organic demand — and the concentration read agrees: the top ten wallets hold 100% of the supply, so the 1.8 million "holders" carry amounts too small to matter. The tracked book, $345.1 thousand of pool liquidity, is real but thin against the FDV.
FAQ
Which is bigger, JCT or 果蝇?
By tracked market cap: JCT (BNB Chain) measures $29.20M and 果蝇 (BNB Chain) measures $7.83K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, JCT or 果蝇?
On the contract checks we publish: JCT (BNB Chain) grades B and 果蝇 (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have JCT and 果蝇 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-30T18:16:02, the measured snapshots show JCT at +134% and 果蝇 at 0.00%.
More comparisons
JCT vs RAINJCT vs HLXJCT vs RENDERCRV vs JCTHLX vs 果蝇RAIN vs 果蝇果蝇 vs RENDERCRV vs 果蝇
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-30T18:16:02; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.