HostJAMES vs DUST — price, size and safety, side by side
JAMES (Monad) vs DUST (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
JAMES vs DUST — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| JAMES | DUST | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.003283 | $0.02877 |
| Market cap | $2.86M | $85.31K |
| 24h volume | $2.25K | $77.13 |
| Liquidity | $69.85K | $59.03K |
| FDV | $3.28M | $2.92M |
| Holders | 2,450 | 1,604 |
| Age (days) | 78 | 84 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- JAMES measures ~34× the market cap of DUST
- JAMES measures ~29× the 24h volume of DUST
- JAMES measures ~1.5× the holder count of DUST
What the data says
JAMES
JAMES — "The Busy Bull of Monad" — is a 78-day-old mascot token on Monad at 0x43cf5407bda1400498b8064d50a7e17528d87777, priced at a $2.9 million market cap on the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
The measured book is thin — $69.9 thousand of tracked liquidity against the cap, with $2.3 thousand of daily volume — the profile of a chain-native mascot still finding its market. Everything structural is an open question this snapshot didn't answer: contract controls weren't evaluated and holder distribution wasn't resolved, so the bull case lives entirely on the tape.
DUST
DUST at 0xad96c3dffcd6374294e2573a7fbba96097cc8d7c — Pixie Dust — is a Monad community token 84 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, with 1,604 holders sharing a 97.9 million supply around an $85.3 thousand market cap.
The contract is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy. The distribution sits at the opposite extreme of clean code: the ten largest wallets hold 99.4% of supply. The $2.9 million fully-diluted figure sits far above the cap, and $59.0 thousand of deep tracked depth sees only $77 of daily volume — a quiet book by any measure.
FAQ
Which is bigger, JAMES or DUST?
By tracked market cap: JAMES (Monad) measures $2.86M and DUST (Monad) measures $85.31K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, JAMES or DUST?
On the contract checks we publish: JAMES (Monad) grades A and DUST (Monad) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have JAMES and DUST performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show JAMES at −2.21% and DUST at −6.29%.
More comparisons
LUIGI vs JAMESJAMES vs KUMAPENG vs JAMESJAMES vs BCOQBELIEVE vs DUSTJTVO vs DUSTDUST vs CNDLDUST vs HAPPY
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.