HostINST vs JPYC — price, size and safety, side by side
INST (Polygon) vs JPYC (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-14 / 2026-11-15.
INST vs JPYC — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-11-14T21:16:23
| INST | JPYC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.75 | $0.006225 |
| Market cap | $155.39M | $82.01M |
| 24h volume | $9.40M all venues | $983.40K all venues |
| Liquidity | $562.03K | $405.95K |
| FDV | $954.93K | $20.42M |
| Holders | 4,511 | 41,397 |
| Age (days) | 1,702 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- INST measures ~1.9× the market cap of JPYC
- INST measures ~9.6× the 24h volume of JPYC
- JPYC measures ~9.2× the holder count of INST
- over the shared window INST moved −12.1% while JPYC moved −1.18%
What the data says
INST
There's a small gap on this page — INST's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-10-09. So it's best treated as unconfirmed rather than assumed clean, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Looking at the market data, INST shows $634.32K of on-chain liquidity, 4,511 wallets holding and 1,702 days old as of 2026-10-09. The number worth sitting with is that $634.32K of depth against a market cap of about $166.93M — a thin pool for a token this size, which means a position that feels small to you can still be large for the pool: INST reprices on relatively little flow, and a sizable exit will slip. The 4,511-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
JPYC
JPYC at 0xe7c3d8c9a439fede00d2600032d5db0be71c3c29 — JPY Coin — is the yen-denominated stablecoin issued by Japan's licensed JPYC operation, and its Polygon row is brand new to this index: one day on the record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot, already carrying 41,397 holders and an asset-wide $82.0 million market cap against a $20.4 million fully-diluted read of the local float.
The measured picture is thin where a stablecoin is usually deep and deep where it is usually quiet: $406.0 thousand of tracked pool liquidity, $49.5 thousand of 24-hour volume, and the ten largest wallets hold 92.7% of supply — a distribution pattern typical of an issuer-managed supply where treasury and redemption contracts dominate the top bracket. The contract is a measured upgradeable proxy, the standard shape for a regulated stablecoin that must stay serviceable.
FAQ
Which is bigger, INST or JPYC?
By tracked market cap: INST (Polygon) measures $155.39M and JPYC (Polygon) measures $82.01M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, INST or JPYC?
On the contract checks we publish: INST (Polygon) grades B and JPYC (Polygon) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have INST and JPYC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-11-14T21:16:23, the measured snapshots show INST at −12.1% and JPYC at −1.18%.
More comparisons
FET vs INSTWBTC vs INSTHLX vs INSTINST vs STABLEMON vs JPYCPYTH vs JPYCJPYC vs CRVSTABLE vs JPYC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-11-14T21:16:23; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.