HostIBS vs B13B — price, size and safety, side by side
IBS (BNB Chain) vs B13B (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-31 / 2026-10-31.
IBS vs B13B — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-31T21:16:17
| IBS | B13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $5.97 | $5.07 |
| Market cap | $23.92M | $29.91M |
| 24h volume | $934.39K DEX | $4.72M DEX |
| Liquidity | $8.36M | $6.41M |
| FDV | $23.80M | $30.09M |
| Holders | 227,215 | 74,599 |
| Age (days) | 152 | 25 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- B13B measures ~5.1× the 24h volume of IBS
- IBS measures ~3.0× the holder count of B13B
- over the shared window IBS moved −36.1% while B13B moved −22.0%
What the data says
IBS
IBS at 0x255e746abb8d9acac00d6d023e5e63e3b8dfa7cd is a young BNB Chain asset — 152 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot — priced at a $23.9 million market cap across a compact 2.6 million supply.
The pool is the standout read in this batch: $8.4 million of tracked depth is deep — a third of the entire market cap sits in the exit book, a ratio most mid-caps never approach. The $934.4 thousand of daily volume is proportionate rather than frenzied. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot, so the authority posture is a live-scan question rather than an assumption this page makes.
B13B
B13B at 0x4902c5ebc598265ed2212b559b042de8a5eeec3f is barely a week into its record — 7 days old at the October 9, 2026 snapshot — and already priced at a $29.9 million market cap effectively equal to its $30.1 million fully-diluted figure on 4.1 million units.
The launch-window book is stronger than most: $6.4 million of deep tracked depth on $14.7 million of 24-hour volume — a tape turning over three times the pool daily, the hot-start profile of a newly listed asset. Everything else about the row is unwritten: no holder distribution, no contract-level controls assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, IBS or B13B?
By tracked market cap: IBS (BNB Chain) measures $23.92M and B13B (BNB Chain) measures $29.91M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, IBS or B13B?
On the contract checks we publish: IBS (BNB Chain) grades C and B13B (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have IBS and B13B performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-31T21:16:17, the measured snapshots show IBS at −36.1% and B13B at −22.0%.
More comparisons
IBS vs SUSDAIUSDC vs IBSIBS vs SKYIBS vs JLPSPX vs B13BENA vs B13BJLP vs B13BB13B vs EUROC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-31T21:16:17; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.