NexIBS vs AGX — price, size and safety, side by side
IBS (BNB Chain) vs AGX (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-10 / 2026-11-11.
IBS vs AGX — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-10T21:13:10
| IBS | AGX | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $5.73 | $1.86 |
| Market cap | $5.23M | — |
| 24h volume | $325.02K all venues | $321.28K DEX |
| Liquidity | $7.20M | $4.75M |
| FDV | $22.90M | $8.73M |
| Holders | 227,215 | 154,843 |
| Age (days) | 152 | 80 |
| Safety grade | C | C |
Where they differ
- IBS measures ~1.5× the liquidity of AGX
- over the shared window IBS moved −38.7% while AGX moved −89.8%
What the data says
IBS
IBS at 0x255e746abb8d9acac00d6d023e5e63e3b8dfa7cd is a young BNB Chain asset — 152 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot — priced at a $5.2 million market cap across a compact 2.6 million supply.
The pool is the standout read in this batch: $7.2 million of tracked depth is deep — a third of the entire market cap sits in the exit book, a ratio most mid-caps never approach. The $934.4 thousand of daily volume is proportionate rather than frenzied. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot, so the authority posture is a live-scan question rather than an assumption this page makes.
AGX
AGX — AEGIS X at 0xe766023f5a0fa6ce91b9f98d327771437dfca077 — is a 65-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $8.7 million market cap against $4.7 million of tracked liquidity at the November 6, 2026 snapshot.
The market side is unusually strong for the age: a pool covering that much of the cap is the deepest ratio in this batch, and roughly $10.6 million of daily volume turns most of it over every day — real two-sided flow, not a stagnant book. What the snapshot could not confirm is the contract itself: mint, pause and upgrade controls were not assessed, so the levers a bad actor would want are unverified rather than cleared.
FAQ
Which is bigger, IBS or AGX?
By tracked market cap: IBS (BNB Chain) measures $5.23M and AGX (BNB Chain) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, IBS or AGX?
On the contract checks we publish: IBS (BNB Chain) grades C and AGX (BNB Chain) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have IBS and AGX performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-10T21:13:10, the measured snapshots show IBS at −38.7% and AGX at −89.8%.
More comparisons
IBS vs KBTCIBS vs USDCSKY vs IBSIBS vs EUROCAGX vs LBTCJLP vs AGXAGX vs JUPSPX vs AGX
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-10T21:13:10; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.