NexHDN vs PEAR — price, size and safety, side by side
HDN (Arbitrum) vs PEAR (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-14.
HDN vs PEAR — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-13T12:15:58
| HDN | PEAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.01628 | $0.01663 |
| Market cap | $3.81M | $9.46M |
| 24h volume | $41.11K all venues | $52.31K all venues |
| Liquidity | $10.38K | $929.51 |
| FDV | $5.58M | $15.68M |
| Holders | 3,023 | 2,431 |
| Age (days) | 525 | 740 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- PEAR measures ~2.5× the market cap of HDN
- HDN measures ~11× the liquidity of PEAR
What the data says
HDN
HDN — Hydranet — is a 525-day-old Arbitrum DEX token at 0xb0f66bdb39acbb043308eb9dbe78f5bb47ea5430, priced at a $3.8 million market cap across 3,023 wallets on the November 6, 2026 snapshot.
The contract is locked — no mint, no pause, no blacklist, verified source — and the float is moderately concentrated with the top ten at about 51.9%. The venue is where the honest size check lands: $10.4 thousand of tracked liquidity is a thin book against a $6.3M cap, on $13.5 thousand of daily volume — held more than it is traded.
PEAR
PEAR at 0x3212dc0f8c834e4de893532d27cc9b6001684db0 is an Arbitrum asset 725 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $9.5 million market cap with a $15.7 million fully-diluted figure on 852.2 million units showing the emission still ahead.
The book is workable for the cap: $929.5 of tracked depth on $58.0 thousand of 24-hour volume — a pool that clears ordinary size and a quiet tape that mostly holds. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot, so the authority posture is a live-scan question rather than an assumption here.
FAQ
Which is bigger, HDN or PEAR?
By tracked market cap: HDN (Arbitrum) measures $3.81M and PEAR (Arbitrum) measures $9.46M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, HDN or PEAR?
On the contract checks we publish: HDN (Arbitrum) grades A and PEAR (Arbitrum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have HDN and PEAR performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-13T12:15:58, the measured snapshots show HDN at −48.9% and PEAR at −49.7%.
More comparisons
HDN vs WEETHCAKE vs HDNHDN vs RETHHDN vs NODAPEAR vs NODAPEAR vs BNSOLPEAR vs JITOSOLPEAR vs JLUSDC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-13T12:15:58; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.