NexHDN vs ESP — price, size and safety, side by side
HDN (Arbitrum) vs ESP (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-15.
HDN vs ESP — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-15T15:15:30
| HDN | ESP | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.01628 | $0.07196 |
| Market cap | $3.81M | $55.11M |
| 24h volume | $41.11K all venues | $2.77M all venues |
| Liquidity | $10.38K | $1.50K |
| FDV | $5.58M | $5.85M |
| Holders | 3,023 | 3,444 |
| Age (days) | 525 | 237 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- ESP measures ~14× the market cap of HDN
- HDN measures ~6.9× the liquidity of ESP
- ESP measures ~67× the 24h volume of HDN
- over the shared window HDN moved −47.3% while ESP moved −24.7%
What the data says
HDN
HDN — Hydranet — is a 525-day-old Arbitrum DEX token at 0xb0f66bdb39acbb043308eb9dbe78f5bb47ea5430, priced at a $3.8 million market cap across 3,023 wallets on the November 6, 2026 snapshot.
The contract is locked — no mint, no pause, no blacklist, verified source — and the float is moderately concentrated with the top ten at about 51.9%. The venue is where the honest size check lands: $10.4 thousand of tracked liquidity is a thin book against a $6.3M cap, on $13.5 thousand of daily volume — held more than it is traded.
ESP
ESP is the token of Espresso Systems — the shared-sequencing and confirmation network built for rollups, launched with a live technical product rather than a roadmap. The contract 0x3b8db18e69d6686ad9371a423afe3dd1065c94f1 is what our scan tracks: $2 thousand of pool liquidity as of November 6, 2026 on Arbitrum.
The honest thesis: Espresso sells fast confirmations and decentralized sequencing to a rollup economy that mostly still runs centralized sequencers — a real product pointed at a real problem. The caution is that the market it serves is still forming: rollup teams have to choose to integrate, and the token's value case rides on that adoption curve more than on present cash flows.
FAQ
Which is bigger, HDN or ESP?
By tracked market cap: HDN (Arbitrum) measures $3.81M and ESP (Arbitrum) measures $55.11M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, HDN or ESP?
On the contract checks we publish: HDN (Arbitrum) grades A and ESP (Arbitrum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have HDN and ESP performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-15T15:15:30, the measured snapshots show HDN at −47.3% and ESP at −24.7%.
More comparisons
HDN vs WEETHCAKE vs HDNHDN vs RETHHDN vs NODAESP vs NODAESP vs BNSOLESP vs JITOSOLESP vs JLUSDC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-15T15:15:30; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.