HostGUN vs EMINI — price, size and safety, side by side
GUN (Avalanche) vs EMINI (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
GUN vs EMINI — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| GUN | EMINI | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.003207 | $0.000004068 |
| Market cap | $11.24M | $40.80K |
| 24h volume | $7.67K | $0.00 |
| Liquidity | $20.29K | $9.79K |
| FDV | $2.16M | $40.68K |
| Holders | 5,725 | 3,796 |
| Age (days) | 535 | 493 |
| Safety grade | B | E |
Where they differ
- GUN measures ~275× the market cap of EMINI
- GUN measures ~2.1× the liquidity of EMINI
- GUN measures ~1.5× the holder count of EMINI
- over the shared window GUN moved +4.87% while EMINI moved −6.84%
What the data says
GUN
GUN — the GUNZ network token — is a 535-day-old Avalanche asset at 0x26debd39d5ed069770406fca10a0e4f8d2c743eb, priced at a $11.2 million market cap across 5,725 wallets on the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
Two flags do the talking: the contract sits behind a proxy, so its logic is upgradeable after the fact, and the top ten wallets hold about 80.3% of the supply — a heavily concentrated float. The venue side is the third caveat: $20.3 thousand of tracked liquidity is a vestige against the cap, so the token is far more widely held than it is tradably deep.
EMINI
EMINI — Emini Spaghettini — is a 493-day-old Avalanche token at 0x8cf71b4f445a47f234a0dc61034708a4087bead0, and it prints the worst contract read in this batch: the owner can mint new supply, can pause transfers or blacklist wallets, and can change balances outright — the full set of holder-lethal levers, behind an obscured owner.
The market data has already priced the trust: a $40.8 thousand market cap against $9.8 thousand of tracked liquidity and $11.3 thousand of daily volume — a vestige book where 3,796 wallets hold residual positions while the top ten control 85.5% of supply.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GUN or EMINI?
By tracked market cap: GUN (Avalanche) measures $11.24M and EMINI (Avalanche) measures $40.80K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GUN or EMINI?
On the contract checks we publish: GUN (Avalanche) grades B and EMINI (Avalanche) grades E. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GUN and EMINI performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show GUN at +4.87% and EMINI at −6.84%.
More comparisons
POWSCHE vs GUNLABZ vs GUNAICMP vs GUN霞 vs GUNEMINI vs XOMXEMINI vs DUSTEMINI vs FRONKEMINI vs MOONDOGE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.