HostGULD vs NVDAX — price, size and safety, side by side
GULD (Ethereum) vs NVDAX (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
GULD vs NVDAX — normalized performance, 2026-09-14 to 2026-09-26T21:07:21
| GULD | NVDAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.02213 | $224.70 |
| Market cap | $37.17M | $72.31M |
| 24h volume | $558.34K | $21.59M |
| Liquidity | $3.39M | $3.28M |
| FDV | $37.64M | $72.31M |
| Holders | 3,251 | 112,776 |
| Age (days) | 131 | — |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- NVDAX measures ~1.9× the market cap of GULD
- NVDAX measures ~39× the 24h volume of GULD
- NVDAX measures ~35× the holder count of GULD
- over the shared window GULD moved +5.25% while NVDAX moved −2.80%
What the data says
GULD
GULD is a gold-themed Ethereum token — the name suggests the same tokenized-gold ambition as PAXG's class, at a fraction of the depth. The contract 0x14d6c649292c5c9790c5196d1a9ea039307947a1 carries September 26, 2026 snapshot liquidity of $3.4 million.
The honest caveat for the name: gold branding on a token proves nothing about gold backing — PAXG's claim is a regulated NYDFS trust with LBMA vaults; a small "gold" token's claim is whatever its issuer says it is. Whether GULD is a genuine metal-backed asset or a theme coin trading on the ticker is exactly what the contract and issuer checks exist to resolve.
NVDAX
NVDAX is a tokenized share of NVIDIA — one of Backed Finance's xStocks, an on-chain instrument designed to track the price of the underlying equity rather than confer it. The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $72.3 million in tracked market value across 112,776 wallets holding mint Xsc9qvGR1efVDFGLrVsmkzv3qi45LTBjeUKSPmx9qEh.
What you are trusting with an xStock is not the token's code but the issuer's custody: each unit is meant to be backed by a real share held off-chain, which makes this a claims-on-custodian instrument wearing a crypto wrapper. That is not a defect — it is the design — but it means the contract's clean grade tells only half the story; the other half is Backed's books, which no scanner can read.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GULD or NVDAX?
By tracked market cap: GULD (Ethereum) measures $37.17M and NVDAX (Solana) measures $72.31M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GULD or NVDAX?
On the contract checks we publish: GULD (Ethereum) grades A and NVDAX (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GULD and NVDAX performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-14 and 2026-09-26T21:07:21, the measured snapshots show GULD at +5.25% and NVDAX at −2.80%.
More comparisons
WBTC vs GULDPENDLE vs GULDMSUSD vs GULDPOD vs GULDDBR vs NVDAXLBTC vs NVDAXEURC vs NVDAXNVDAX vs SPX
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-14→2026-09-26T21:07:21; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.