HostGP vs PAXG — price, size and safety, side by side
GP (Solana) vs PAXG (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
GP vs PAXG — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| GP | PAXG | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.5691 | $4.28K |
| Market cap | $27.26M | $1.86B |
| 24h volume | $278.72K | $1.17M |
| Liquidity | $403.09K | $20.43M |
| FDV | $27.26M | $1.85B |
| Holders | 10,895 | 88,116 |
| Age (days) | — | 334 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- PAXG measures ~68× the market cap of GP
- PAXG measures ~51× the liquidity of GP
- PAXG measures ~4.2× the 24h volume of GP
- PAXG measures ~8.1× the holder count of GP
- over the shared window GP moved +82.0% while PAXG moved −2.96%
What the data says
GP
GP is Graphite Protocol's ecosystem token on Solana — the utility asset of an infrastructure project building reputation and identity tooling for Solana applications. The mint 31k88G5Mq7ptbRDf3AM13HAq6wRQHXHikR8hik7wPygk is what our scan tracks: $27.3 million market cap, $403 thousand of liquidity and 10,895 holders as of September 26, 2026 — a grade-A row with an unusually healthy liquidity-to-cap ratio for this tier.
The honest read on a token like this is adoption math: its value case rests on whether Graphite's tooling sees sustained use across Solana apps, which is a slower-burn question than price action suggests. The holder base is broad and the pool is genuinely deep relative to supply — the figures describe a market that functions, which is more than most tokens this size can claim.
PAXG
PAXG is Paxos's tokenized gold — each token a claim on one fine troy ounce held in LBMA vaults in London, making it the most direct on-chain gold exposure in this index. The deployment 0x45804880de22913dafe09f4980848ece6ecbaf78 is the canonical mint; our September 27, 2026 snapshot reads $20.4 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest frame is the custodial one: a PAXG is only as good as Paxos's vault attestations and redemption rails — Paxos is a NYDFS-regulated trust, which puts this in the "institutional-grade claim" bucket alongside USDC rather than the commodity-fantasy bucket — but it is still a claim, and redemption has minimums most wallets will never meet. The token tracks spot gold minus the custody premium; what it cannot track is the deep liquidity of actual gold markets.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GP or PAXG?
By tracked market cap: GP (Solana) measures $27.26M and PAXG (Ethereum) measures $1.86B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GP or PAXG?
On the contract checks we publish: GP (Solana) grades A and PAXG (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GP and PAXG performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show GP at +82.0% and PAXG at −2.96%.
More comparisons
POWER vs GPBEER vs GPGP vs ICPGP vs BLACKOLD SLERF vs PAXGPAXG vs USDMPAXG vs JUPUSDVVV vs PAXG
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.