HostGOHM vs KET — price, size and safety, side by side
GOHM (Avalanche) vs KET (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-15.
GOHM vs KET — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-15T15:15:30
| GOHM | KET | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $4.22K | $0.0005659 |
| Market cap | — | $663.19K |
| 24h volume | $4.13K DEX | $261.77 all venues |
| Liquidity | $97.30K | $91.50K |
| FDV | $2.84M | $663.17K |
| Holders | 7,457 | 32,354 |
| Age (days) | 1,758 | 614 |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- GOHM measures ~16× the 24h volume of KET
- KET measures ~4.3× the holder count of GOHM
- over the shared window GOHM moved −23.0% while KET moved −73.0%
What the data says
GOHM
GOHM — Governance OHM — is the wrapped-governance form of Olympus's OHM, and it is one of the oldest assets in this batch: 1,758 days on the November 6, 2026 snapshot, at 0x321e7092a180bb43555132ec53aaa65a5bf84251 on Avalanche.
The numbers need their unit context: a per-token price of $5,479.54 across a supply of 621 pieces prices a fully diluted valuation of $2.8 million, against $97.3 thousand of tracked liquidity — a thin but proportional book for a vestige asset. GOHM inherits its risk twice: the wrapper contract and the rebasing OHM underneath it, and this snapshot didn't evaluate contract-level controls.
KET
KET at 0xffff003a6bad9b743d658048742935fffe2b6ed7 is an Avalanche community token 614 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $663 thousand market cap across a 1.0 billion supply.
The book is deep for the cap and the tape healthy: $91.5 thousand of tracked depth on $65.8 thousand of 24-hour volume — a pool proportionate to the small valuation, cycling itself daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GOHM or KET?
By tracked market cap: GOHM (Avalanche) measures — and KET (Avalanche) measures $663.19K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GOHM or KET?
On the contract checks we publish: GOHM (Avalanche) grades C and KET (Avalanche) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GOHM and KET performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-15T15:15:30, the measured snapshots show GOHM at −23.0% and KET at −73.0%.
More comparisons
GOHM vs WLDLDO vs GOHMAVAX vs GOHMGOHM vs USDEWLD vs KETKET vs USDELDO vs KETAVAX vs KET
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-15T15:15:30; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.