HostGOHM vs DAI.E — price, size and safety, side by side
GOHM (Avalanche) vs DAI.E (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
GOHM vs DAI.E — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| GOHM | DAI.E | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $5.53K | $1.00 |
| Market cap | — | $10.78M |
| 24h volume | $3.54K | $105.28K |
| Liquidity | $116.22K | $96.41K |
| FDV | $3.42M | $10.78M |
| Holders | 7,457 | 43,637 |
| Age (days) | 1,758 | 1,250 |
| Safety grade | C | C |
Where they differ
- DAI.E measures ~30× the 24h volume of GOHM
- DAI.E measures ~5.9× the holder count of GOHM
What the data says
GOHM
GOHM — Governance OHM — is the wrapped-governance form of Olympus's OHM, and it is one of the oldest assets in this batch: 1,758 days on the September 27, 2026 snapshot, at 0x321e7092a180bb43555132ec53aaa65a5bf84251 on Avalanche.
The numbers need their unit context: a per-token price of $5,479.54 across a supply of 621 pieces prices a market cap of $3.4 million, against $116.2 thousand of tracked liquidity — a thin but proportional book for a vestige asset. GOHM inherits its risk twice: the wrapper contract and the rebasing OHM underneath it, and this snapshot didn't evaluate contract-level controls.
DAI.E
DAI.E at 0xd586e7f844cea2f87f50152665bcbc2c279d8d70 is the legacy Avalanche Bridge deployment of MakerDAO's dollar stablecoin — the ".e" suffix marking the original bridge's claim — 1,250 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot and priced at a $10.8 million market cap on 10.7 million local units.
The book is workable and the tape is the liveliest of the legacy ".e" floats: $96.4 thousand of tracked depth on $133.8 thousand of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling itself daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GOHM or DAI.E?
By tracked market cap: GOHM (Avalanche) measures — and DAI.E (Avalanche) measures $10.78M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GOHM or DAI.E?
On the contract checks we publish: GOHM (Avalanche) grades C and DAI.E (Avalanche) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GOHM and DAI.E performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show GOHM at +1.00% and DAI.E at +0.56%.
More comparisons
GOHM vs XERISTRUMAN vs GOHMGOHM vs KOHAIFRIC vs GOHMDAI.E vs SOLCWHITEWHALE vs DAI.EDAI.E vs CNKT+DAI.E vs WEN
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.