NexGNS vs WOO — price, size and safety, side by side
GNS (Arbitrum) vs WOO (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-14 / 2026-11-13.
GNS vs WOO — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-12T21:16:22
| GNS | WOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.3081 | $0.01024 |
| Market cap | $8.85M | $22.60M |
| 24h volume | $347.18K all venues | $4.27M all venues |
| Liquidity | $165.59K | $552.78K |
| FDV | $7.09M | $22.60M |
| Holders | 14,134 | 19,358 |
| Age (days) | 832 | 374 |
| Safety grade | D | A |
Where they differ
- WOO measures ~2.6× the market cap of GNS
- WOO measures ~3.3× the liquidity of GNS
- WOO measures ~12× the 24h volume of GNS
What the data says
GNS
GNS at 0x18c11fd286c5ec11c3b683caa813b77f5163a122 is the Gains Network token on Arbitrum — the asset of a decentralized leverage-trading platform, 832 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot. 14,134 holders share the book around a $8.9 million market cap, against a $7.1 million fully-diluted figure that sits below the cap — an unusual inversion reflecting a circulating float larger than the measured local supply basis of 16.7 million units.
The D grade is earned on the contract side: mint authority is still active and new supply can be minted. Freeze authority is revoked, and it is not a proxy. The ten largest wallets hold 56.7% of supply. $165.6 thousand of workable tracked depth sees $22.6 thousand of daily volume.
WOO
WOO is the token of WOO Network — the liquidity network and exchange stack (WOOFi, WOO X) that routes institutional-style execution to retail venues. The contract 0x4691937a7508860f876c9c0a2a617e7d9e945d4b is what our scan tracks: $553 thousand of pool liquidity as of November 6, 2026.
The honest shape: WOO is an exchange-ecosystem token, which means its value case tracks the volumes and staking economics of venues most retail holders will never open an account on — the thesis is B2B plumbing, not a consumer product. It has also been through a real cycle — a senior token that has lived through both the exchange-token mania and the hangover — so the pool here is liquid but the narrative is quieter than it was.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GNS or WOO?
By tracked market cap: GNS (Arbitrum) measures $8.85M and WOO (Ethereum) measures $22.60M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GNS or WOO?
On the contract checks we publish: GNS (Arbitrum) grades D and WOO (Ethereum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GNS and WOO performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-12T21:16:22, the measured snapshots show GNS at −14.3% and WOO at −15.4%.
More comparisons
ZRO vs GNSETHFI vs GNSGRASS vs GNSGNS vs FFFET vs WOOWBTC vs WOOHLX vs WOOWOO vs STABLE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-12T21:16:22; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.