HostGNS vs WOO — price, size and safety, side by side
GNS (Arbitrum) vs WOO (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
GNS vs WOO — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| GNS | WOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.4887 | $0.0121 |
| Market cap | $11.60M | $25.14M |
| 24h volume | $21.37K | $845.49K |
| Liquidity | $213.78K | $593.54K |
| FDV | $8.18M | $25.14M |
| Holders | 14,134 | 19,358 |
| Age (days) | 832 | 374 |
| Safety grade | D | A |
Where they differ
- WOO measures ~2.2× the market cap of GNS
- WOO measures ~2.8× the liquidity of GNS
- WOO measures ~40× the 24h volume of GNS
- over the shared window GNS moved +9.30% while WOO moved 0.00%
What the data says
GNS
GNS at 0x18c11fd286c5ec11c3b683caa813b77f5163a122 is the Gains Network token on Arbitrum — the asset of a decentralized leverage-trading platform, 832 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. 14,134 holders share the book around a $11.6 million market cap, against a $8.2 million fully-diluted figure that sits below the cap — an unusual inversion reflecting a circulating float larger than the measured local supply basis of 16.7 million units.
The D grade is earned on the contract side: mint authority is still active and new supply can be minted. Freeze authority is revoked, and it is not a proxy. The ten largest wallets hold 56.7% of supply. $213.8 thousand of workable tracked depth sees $22.6 thousand of daily volume.
WOO
WOO is the token of WOO Network — the liquidity network and exchange stack (WOOFi, WOO X) that routes institutional-style execution to retail venues. The contract 0x4691937a7508860f876c9c0a2a617e7d9e945d4b is what our scan tracks: $594 thousand of pool liquidity as of September 26, 2026.
The honest shape: WOO is an exchange-ecosystem token, which means its value case tracks the volumes and staking economics of venues most retail holders will never open an account on — the thesis is B2B plumbing, not a consumer product. It has also been through a real cycle — a senior token that has lived through both the exchange-token mania and the hangover — so the pool here is liquid but the narrative is quieter than it was.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GNS or WOO?
By tracked market cap: GNS (Arbitrum) measures $11.60M and WOO (Ethereum) measures $25.14M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GNS or WOO?
On the contract checks we publish: GNS (Arbitrum) grades D and WOO (Ethereum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GNS and WOO performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show GNS at +9.30% and WOO at 0.00%.
More comparisons
GNS vs CBZECGNS vs NESTGNS vs DRAMARB vs GNSMSETH vs WOOWOO vs LABCOLLECT vs WOOAAPLX vs WOO
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.