HostGNS vs VCNT — price, size and safety, side by side
GNS (Arbitrum) vs VCNT (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-14 / 2026-11-15.
GNS vs VCNT — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-11-14T21:16:23
| GNS | VCNT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.3081 | $18.02 |
| Market cap | $8.85M | — |
| 24h volume | $347.18K all venues | $25.47K DEX |
| Liquidity | $165.59K | $24.42K |
| FDV | $7.09M | $182.47M |
| Holders | 14,134 | 6,275 |
| Age (days) | 832 | 1,215 |
| Safety grade | D | B |
Where they differ
- GNS measures ~6.8× the liquidity of VCNT
- GNS measures ~14× the 24h volume of VCNT
- GNS measures ~2.3× the holder count of VCNT
- over the shared window GNS moved −24.4% while VCNT moved −2.45%
What the data says
GNS
GNS at 0x18c11fd286c5ec11c3b683caa813b77f5163a122 is the Gains Network token on Arbitrum — the asset of a decentralized leverage-trading platform, 832 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot. 14,134 holders share the book around a $8.9 million market cap, against a $7.1 million fully-diluted figure that sits below the cap — an unusual inversion reflecting a circulating float larger than the measured local supply basis of 16.7 million units.
The D grade is earned on the contract side: mint authority is still active and new supply can be minted. Freeze authority is revoked, and it is not a proxy. The ten largest wallets hold 56.7% of supply. $165.6 thousand of workable tracked depth sees $22.6 thousand of daily volume.
VCNT
There's a small gap on this page — VCNT's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-10-09. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
Looking at the market data, VCNT shows a $56.01K pool, 6,275 holders and an established 1,215-day history as of 2026-10-09. Read $56.01K of depth against the size you intend to trade rather than in isolation — it's the pool your exit has to pass through, so it doubles as a sensible position ceiling. The 6,275-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of VCNT as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GNS or VCNT?
By tracked market cap: GNS (Arbitrum) measures $8.85M and VCNT (Polygon) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GNS or VCNT?
On the contract checks we publish: GNS (Arbitrum) grades D and VCNT (Polygon) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GNS and VCNT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-11-14T21:16:23, the measured snapshots show GNS at −24.4% and VCNT at −2.45%.
More comparisons
ZRO vs GNSETHFI vs GNSGRASS vs GNSGNS vs FFVCNT vs CAKEVCNT vs WEETHVCNT vs RETHVCNT vs NODA
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-11-14T21:16:23; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.