HostGNS vs SOIL — price, size and safety, side by side
GNS (Arbitrum) vs SOIL (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
GNS vs SOIL — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| GNS | SOIL | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.4887 | $0.0998 |
| Market cap | $11.60M | $7.85M |
| 24h volume | $21.37K | $9.05K |
| Liquidity | $213.78K | $22.64K |
| FDV | $8.18M | $10.10M |
| Holders | 14,134 | 4,563 |
| Age (days) | 832 | 1,077 |
| Safety grade | D | A |
Where they differ
- GNS measures ~9.4× the liquidity of SOIL
- GNS measures ~2.4× the 24h volume of SOIL
- GNS measures ~3.1× the holder count of SOIL
- over the shared window GNS moved +9.30% while SOIL moved −2.17%
What the data says
GNS
GNS at 0x18c11fd286c5ec11c3b683caa813b77f5163a122 is the Gains Network token on Arbitrum — the asset of a decentralized leverage-trading platform, 832 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. 14,134 holders share the book around a $11.6 million market cap, against a $8.2 million fully-diluted figure that sits below the cap — an unusual inversion reflecting a circulating float larger than the measured local supply basis of 16.7 million units.
The D grade is earned on the contract side: mint authority is still active and new supply can be minted. Freeze authority is revoked, and it is not a proxy. The ten largest wallets hold 56.7% of supply. $213.8 thousand of workable tracked depth sees $22.6 thousand of daily volume.
SOIL
On the two things that matter most in a token contract, SOIL looks great. Minting simply isn't in the contract, so dilution isn't on the table, and it can't stop a sale either, so selling is always your call. That leaves SOIL at a healthy 85/100 as of 2026-09-26, with only normal market risk left to price in.
Here's where SOIL stands today: $22.64K of on-chain liquidity, 4,563 holders and an established record at 1,077 days as of 2026-09-26. Weigh the $22.64K pool against a ~$7.85M cap and one thing stands out — it's a slim pool for the size, so SOIL's price is easier to move than its market cap implies, and large size should scale in and out patiently. The 4,563-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-09-26, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GNS or SOIL?
By tracked market cap: GNS (Arbitrum) measures $11.60M and SOIL (Polygon) measures $7.85M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GNS or SOIL?
On the contract checks we publish: GNS (Arbitrum) grades D and SOIL (Polygon) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GNS and SOIL performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show GNS at +9.30% and SOIL at −2.17%.
More comparisons
GNS vs CBZECGNS vs NESTGNS vs DRAMARB vs GNSSOIL vs 索拉拉WORLDCUP vs SOILGARI vs SOILBOATKID vs SOIL
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.