HostGNS vs RAIN — price, size and safety, side by side
GNS (Arbitrum) vs RAIN (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-14 / 2026-11-15.
GNS vs RAIN — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-14T21:16:23
| GNS | RAIN | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.3081 | $0.003653 |
| Market cap | $8.85M | $4.12B |
| 24h volume | $347.18K all venues | $12.83M all venues |
| Liquidity | $165.59K | $115.75K |
| FDV | $7.09M | $6.59B |
| Holders | 14,134 | 173,867 |
| Age (days) | 832 | 355 |
| Safety grade | D | B |
Where they differ
- RAIN measures ~466× the market cap of GNS
- RAIN measures ~37× the 24h volume of GNS
- RAIN measures ~12× the holder count of GNS
- over the shared window GNS moved −30.2% while RAIN moved −73.5%
What the data says
GNS
GNS at 0x18c11fd286c5ec11c3b683caa813b77f5163a122 is the Gains Network token on Arbitrum — the asset of a decentralized leverage-trading platform, 832 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot. 14,134 holders share the book around a $8.9 million market cap, against a $7.1 million fully-diluted figure that sits below the cap — an unusual inversion reflecting a circulating float larger than the measured local supply basis of 16.7 million units.
The D grade is earned on the contract side: mint authority is still active and new supply can be minted. Freeze authority is revoked, and it is not a proxy. The ten largest wallets hold 56.7% of supply. $165.6 thousand of workable tracked depth sees $22.6 thousand of daily volume.
RAIN
RAIN is a mid-cap token on Arbitrum trading on real depth: the contract 0x25118290e6a5f4139381d072181157035864099d is what our scan tracks, with $116 thousand of pool liquidity as of November 6, 2026.
The honest note is about verifiability rather than the project: tokens in this tier have shallow public documentation, and our scan's read is primarily on-chain — the pool is real and functional, but verify the project's identity and contract ownership through its official channels before treating the liquidity as endorsement. Arbitrum hosts a long tail of tokens that look similar in a scan.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GNS or RAIN?
By tracked market cap: GNS (Arbitrum) measures $8.85M and RAIN (Arbitrum) measures $4.12B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GNS or RAIN?
On the contract checks we publish: GNS (Arbitrum) grades D and RAIN (Arbitrum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GNS and RAIN performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-14T21:16:23, the measured snapshots show GNS at −30.2% and RAIN at −73.5%.
More comparisons
ZRO vs GNSETHFI vs GNSGRASS vs GNSGNS vs FFLINK vs RAINRAIN vs AVAXRAIN vs LDORAIN vs WLD
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-14T21:16:23; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.