NexGMX vs LAVA — price, size and safety, side by side
GMX (Arbitrum) vs LAVA (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-14 / 2026-11-14.
GMX vs LAVA — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-14T21:16:23
| GMX | LAVA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $7.09 | $0.01621 |
| Market cap | $91.09M | $9.56M |
| 24h volume | $3.96M all venues | $511.05K all venues |
| Liquidity | $357.56K | $355.55K |
| FDV | $93.57M | $3.11M |
| Holders | 297,710 | 4,745 |
| Age (days) | 212 | 286 |
| Safety grade | D | C |
Where they differ
- GMX measures ~9.5× the market cap of LAVA
- GMX measures ~7.8× the 24h volume of LAVA
- GMX measures ~63× the holder count of LAVA
- over the shared window GMX moved −11.6% while LAVA moved +18.4%
What the data says
GMX
GMX at 0xfc5a1a6eb076a2c7ad06ed22c90d7e710e35ad0a is the governance and fee-share token of the GMX perpetuals exchange on Arbitrum — the asset whose stakers earn a cut of the venue's real trading revenue rather than emissions-funded yield. The November 6, 2026 snapshot prices an $91.1 million market cap on the 11.0 million local units, with the $93.6 million fully-diluted figure sitting barely above the cap — a supply nearly fully emitted, the designed scarcity of a hard-capped exchange token.
The local book at this deployment — 194 days into its recorded history — holds $358 thousand of workable tracked depth on $73.4 thousand of daily volume: a book that does its real turnover across the venue's own GLP markets and sister deployments rather than this slice of pools.
LAVA
LAVA at 0x11e969e9b3f89cb16d686a03cd8508c9fc0361af is an Arbitrum deployment of the Lava Network token, 286 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $9.6 million market cap sits above the $3.1 million fully-diluted figure priced on 203.4 million local units.
The local book is workable against the slice: $355.5 thousand of tracked depth on $23.3 thousand of 24-hour volume — a pool that can take exits and a quiet tape that mostly holds. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GMX or LAVA?
By tracked market cap: GMX (Arbitrum) measures $91.09M and LAVA (Arbitrum) measures $9.56M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GMX or LAVA?
On the contract checks we publish: GMX (Arbitrum) grades D and LAVA (Arbitrum) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GMX and LAVA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-14T21:16:23, the measured snapshots show GMX at −11.6% and LAVA at +18.4%.
More comparisons
GMX vs CRVGMX vs GOHOMEMON vs GMXGMX vs VIRTUALLAVA vs CRVLAVA vs GOHOMELAVA vs VIRTUALMON vs LAVA
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-14T21:16:23; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.