NexGMX vs CRV — price, size and safety, side by side
GMX (Arbitrum) vs CRV (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-14 / 2026-11-12.
GMX vs CRV — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-11-12T21:16:22
| GMX | CRV | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $7.09 | $0.2376 |
| Market cap | $91.09M | $416.06M |
| 24h volume | $3.96M all venues | $47.95M all venues |
| Liquidity | $357.56K | $8.70M |
| FDV | $93.57M | $638.63M |
| Holders | 297,710 | 101,017 |
| Age (days) | 212 | 1,105 |
| Safety grade | D | B |
Where they differ
- CRV measures ~4.6× the market cap of GMX
- CRV measures ~24× the liquidity of GMX
- CRV measures ~12× the 24h volume of GMX
- GMX measures ~2.9× the holder count of CRV
- over the shared window GMX moved −11.6% while CRV moved −30.9%
What the data says
GMX
GMX at 0xfc5a1a6eb076a2c7ad06ed22c90d7e710e35ad0a is the governance and fee-share token of the GMX perpetuals exchange on Arbitrum — the asset whose stakers earn a cut of the venue's real trading revenue rather than emissions-funded yield. The November 6, 2026 snapshot prices an $91.1 million market cap on the 11.0 million local units, with the $93.6 million fully-diluted figure sitting barely above the cap — a supply nearly fully emitted, the designed scarcity of a hard-capped exchange token.
The local book at this deployment — 194 days into its recorded history — holds $358 thousand of workable tracked depth on $73.4 thousand of daily volume: a book that does its real turnover across the venue's own GLP markets and sister deployments rather than this slice of pools.
CRV
CRV — Curve DAO Token at 0xd533a949740bb3306d119cc777fa900ba034cd52 — is the governance and incentive token of Curve, the stable-swap AMM that carries a meaningful share of all stablecoin and LST volume on Ethereum. This is a six-year-old protocol token, not a launch, and the honest risks are the ones an established protocol token actually runs: governance economics, emissions, and founder concentration — not honeypot mechanics.
The November 6, 2026 snapshot reads a $416.1 million market cap against an $638.6 million fully-diluted value — roughly two-thirds of eventual supply circulating — with $8.7 million of tracked pool depth and 101,017 holders. Depth at that scale is a real exit book for a retail position.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GMX or CRV?
By tracked market cap: GMX (Arbitrum) measures $91.09M and CRV (Ethereum) measures $416.06M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GMX or CRV?
On the contract checks we publish: GMX (Arbitrum) grades D and CRV (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GMX and CRV performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-11-12T21:16:22, the measured snapshots show GMX at −11.6% and CRV at −30.9%.
More comparisons
GMX vs GOHOMEMON vs GMXGMX vs VIRTUALPYTH vs GMXCRV vs SKYSUSDAI vs CRVUSDTB vs CRVCRV vs KBTC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-11-12T21:16:22; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.