HostGMT vs CES — price, size and safety, side by side
GMT (Polygon) vs CES (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-15.
GMT vs CES — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-15T15:15:30
| GMT | CES | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.005429 | $0.1828 |
| Market cap | $18.90M | — |
| 24h volume | $4.97M all venues | $250.40K DEX |
| Liquidity | $535.03K | $467.02K |
| FDV | $12.18M | $89.44M |
| Holders | 46,298 | — |
| Age (days) | 963 | 512 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- GMT measures ~20× the 24h volume of CES
- over the shared window GMT moved −34.9% while CES moved −29.4%
What the data says
GMT
GMT at 0x714db550b574b3e927af3d93e26127d15721d4c2 — Green Metaverse Token — is STEPN's governance asset in bridged Polygon form, the move-to-earn token that peaked with the app cycle and settled into the long tail. The November 6, 2026 snapshot prices a $18.9 million market cap against a $12.2 million fully-diluted read of the local float of 2.0 billion units.
The book is modest and honest: $535.0 thousand of tracked depth is workable for the size, on $30.2 thousand of 24-hour volume — a consumer-app token's steady-state tape, far off its cycle peak but still trading real size against its pools. The deployment is 963 days into this index's record.
CES
CES at 0x1bdf71ede1a4777db1eebe7232bcda20d6fc1610 — listed as WhaleBit — is the utility token of the Meta Whale ecosystem on Polygon, 494 days into its record at the September 21, 2026 snapshot. The snapshot prices no market cap on the row; what it measures instead is $601.6 thousand of tracked pool depth, $445.2 thousand of 24-hour volume and 293,912 holders — a very wide holder count for a token this size, the signature of an ecosystem distributing units to its own members.
The deploy is a measured upgradeable proxy — the code behind the address can be swapped after deployment — and the ten largest wallets hold 84.1% of the 422.1 million supply. Both are shapes to weigh on an ecosystem token: upgradeability is how a managed project stays maintained, and heavy top concentration is how ecosystem treasuries typically look — the same flag also describes insider-heavy books.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GMT or CES?
By tracked market cap: GMT (Polygon) measures $18.90M and CES (Polygon) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GMT or CES?
On the contract checks we publish: GMT (Polygon) grades B and CES (Polygon) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GMT and CES performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-15T15:15:30, the measured snapshots show GMT at −34.9% and CES at −29.4%.
More comparisons
FET vs GMTWBTC vs GMTGMT vs STABLEHLX vs GMTSTABLE vs CESCES vs PYTHCES vs MONFET vs CES
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-15T15:15:30; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.