HostGITLAWB vs ZEN — price, size and safety, side by side
GITLAWB (Base) vs ZEN (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
GITLAWB vs ZEN — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| GITLAWB | ZEN | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00004567 | $7.88 |
| Market cap | $6.09M | $146.28M |
| 24h volume | $1.50M | $4.76M |
| Liquidity | $1.90M | $1.44M |
| FDV | $6.05M | $167.58M |
| Holders | 11,544 | 104,424 |
| Age (days) | 194 | 425 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- ZEN measures ~24× the market cap of GITLAWB
- ZEN measures ~3.2× the 24h volume of GITLAWB
- ZEN measures ~9.0× the holder count of GITLAWB
- over the shared window GITLAWB moved −25.1% while ZEN moved −1.25%
What the data says
GITLAWB
GITLAWB at 0x5f980dcfc4c0fa3911554cf5ab288ed0eb13dba3 is a Base asset 194 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $6.1 million market cap across a 100.0 billion supply.
The book is unusually liquid for the cap: $1.9 million of tracked depth is deep — nearly a third of the valuation — and the $1.5 million daily volume nearly cycles the whole pool every day, a genuinely active tape rather than a dormant holding. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot, so authority posture is a live-scan question, not an assumption here.
ZEN
ZEN is Horizen's token — a veteran privacy-chain project that migrated its ecosystem onto a Base-settled architecture after years as a standalone chain. The contract 0xf43eb8de897fbc7f2502483b2bef7bb9ea179229 is the Base deployment our scan tracks, at $1.4 million of pool liquidity as of September 26, 2026.
The honest read: ZEN is a legacy-network bet in a new wrapper — the zero-knowledge lineage and once-large validator base are real, and so is the migration risk: projects that replatform are simultaneously conceding the old home couldn't hold them and asking the new one to re-rate them. Watch whether Base-era usage actually follows the token.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GITLAWB or ZEN?
By tracked market cap: GITLAWB (Base) measures $6.09M and ZEN (Base) measures $146.28M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GITLAWB or ZEN?
On the contract checks we publish: GITLAWB (Base) grades B and ZEN (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GITLAWB and ZEN performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show GITLAWB at −25.1% and ZEN at −1.25%.
More comparisons
GITLAWB vs MONGITLAWB vs NVDACGITLAWB vs FETTROLL vs GITLAWBATH vs ZENZEN vs MKRZEN vs TSLAXZEN vs TEL
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.