HostGITLAWB vs NOCK — price, size and safety, side by side
GITLAWB (Base) vs NOCK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
GITLAWB vs NOCK — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| GITLAWB | NOCK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00004567 | $0.02963 |
| Market cap | $6.09M | $94.18M |
| 24h volume | $1.50M | $981.79K |
| Liquidity | $1.90M | $1.50M |
| FDV | $6.05M | $62.51M |
| Holders | 11,544 | 9,289 |
| Age (days) | 194 | 273 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- NOCK measures ~15× the market cap of GITLAWB
- GITLAWB measures ~1.5× the 24h volume of NOCK
What the data says
GITLAWB
GITLAWB at 0x5f980dcfc4c0fa3911554cf5ab288ed0eb13dba3 is a Base asset 194 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $6.1 million market cap across a 100.0 billion supply.
The book is unusually liquid for the cap: $1.9 million of tracked depth is deep — nearly a third of the valuation — and the $1.5 million daily volume nearly cycles the whole pool every day, a genuinely active tape rather than a dormant holding. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot, so authority posture is a live-scan question, not an assumption here.
NOCK
Nock (NOCK) is the Base-traded representation of Nockchain's token — a young zero-knowledge proof-of-work chain with a genuinely novel consensus design (proof-of-work over zkVM execution). The contract 0x9b5e262cf9bb04869ab40b19af91d2dc85761722 is what our scan tracks, at $1.5 million of pool liquidity as of September 26, 2026.
The honest read: the technology is real and unusually interesting for a chain this young — which is exactly the stage where token pricing is pure narrative. The chain's own venues are nascent; this Base pool is a secondary market for a token whose primary network is still proving itself.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GITLAWB or NOCK?
By tracked market cap: GITLAWB (Base) measures $6.09M and NOCK (Base) measures $94.18M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GITLAWB or NOCK?
On the contract checks we publish: GITLAWB (Base) grades B and NOCK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GITLAWB and NOCK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show GITLAWB at −25.1% and NOCK at −26.8%.
More comparisons
GITLAWB vs MONGITLAWB vs NVDACGITLAWB vs FETTROLL vs GITLAWBNOCK vs FOLD2Z vs NOCKYZY vs NOCKGSTOCK vs NOCK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.