HostGHST vs 牛来 — price, size and safety, side by side
GHST (Base) vs 牛来 (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-29 / 2026-10-07.
GHST vs 牛来 — normalized performance, 2026-09-14 to 2026-09-28
| GHST | 牛来 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1014 | $0.0001305 |
| Market cap | — | $294.67K |
| 24h volume | $3.20M DEX | $25.77M DEX |
| Liquidity | $16.50M | $9.73M |
| FDV | $396.29M | $294.67K |
| Holders | 31 | 4,887 |
| Age (days) | 237 | 0 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- GHST measures ~1.7× the liquidity of 牛来
- 牛来 measures ~8.0× the 24h volume of GHST
- 牛来 measures ~158× the holder count of GHST
- over the shared window GHST moved 0.00% while 牛来 moved +27.7%
What the data says
GHST
Start with the discrepancy, because on this row it is the useful part: the venue feed names this Base deployment "So4," while the ticker and slug in our index carry GHST — the name Aavegotchi's long-running game token trades under. At 0xac780b6e4ee50585df265c7766cc2bed51e43fb8, our October 6, 2026 snapshot reads about $16.5 million of tracked pool liquidity against roughly $3.2 million of recorded daily volume — a working level of turnover for a mid-cap game token.
Name mismatches between a feed and an index happen for boring reasons (a token rebrands upstream, a feed carries a different label) and for dangerous ones (a different asset wearing a famous ticker). The address is the arbiter: Aavegotchi's GHST is a known, years-old deployment, and whether this contract is the genuine Base deployment or an impersonation riding the name is a fact the address — never the ticker — settles. The live scanner above reads the contract directly and is the fastest way to confirm which case this is.
牛来
牛来 on Base — 0x9daa8aa9a188032d6781715f77feb0adc4f96b07 — is the second of three same-named contracts in this index: $9.7 million of liquidity against roughly $25.8 million of daily volume in the October 6, 2026 snapshot.
Look at the numbers next to its sibling: $9.725 million of liquidity versus $9.744 million — within two tenths of a percent — and a price within a thousandth of a cent of the other clone. Two contracts holding statistically identical liquidity at an identical price point is not a coincidence of markets; it is one operation running parallel books. Whether that arrangement is a coordinated multi-pool strategy or something less benign, the practical reading is the same: the two clones' fates are linked.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GHST or 牛来?
By tracked market cap: GHST (Base) measures — and 牛来 (Base) measures $294.67K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GHST or 牛来?
On the contract checks we publish: GHST (Base) grades A and 牛来 (Base) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GHST and 牛来 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-14 and 2026-09-28, the measured snapshots show GHST at 0.00% and 牛来 at +27.7%.
More comparisons
PEPE vs GHSTKBTC vs GHSTGHST vs UVVV vs GHST牛来 vs USDCUSDTB vs 牛来牛来 vs SUSDAI牛来 vs SKY
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-14→2026-09-28; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.