NexGENIUS vs LAB — price, size and safety, side by side
GENIUS (BNB Chain) vs LAB (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-11 / 2026-11-10.
GENIUS vs LAB — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-10T21:13:10
| GENIUS | LAB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.2847 | $0.0411 |
| Market cap | $100.61M | $34.69M |
| 24h volume | $4.28M all venues | $11.86M all venues |
| Liquidity | $626.74K | $556.52K |
| FDV | $268.51M | $44.28M |
| Holders | 23,163 | — |
| Age (days) | 162 | 361 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- GENIUS measures ~2.9× the market cap of LAB
- LAB measures ~2.8× the 24h volume of GENIUS
What the data says
GENIUS
GENIUS at 0x1f12b85aac097e43aa1555b2881e98a51090e9a6 is a young BNB Chain asset — 162 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot — priced at a $100.6 million market cap with a $268.5 million fully-diluted figure on 1.0 billion units showing the majority of supply still ahead.
The measured contradictions are the story. The contract is locked: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy. But the ten largest wallets hold 98.4% of supply, and 23,163 holders share the remainder — a locked contract over a concentrated book. $626.7 thousand of thin tracked depth sees $19.4 million of 24-hour volume — a tape turning over twenty-seven times the pool daily, the signature of a heavily routed asset rather than a pool-traded one.
LAB
LAB at 0x7ec43cf65f1663f820427c62a5780b8f2e25593a is a BNB Chain token 343 days into its record at the September 21, 2026 snapshot, carrying 33,502 holders around a $41.4 million market cap — with a $53.1 million fully-diluted figure on 990.0 million units showing the supply still ahead.
The contract posture is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy — the full clean set. Distribution is the counterweight worth pricing: the ten largest wallets hold 62.8% of supply, a top-weighted bracket on an otherwise broad holder book. $590.4 thousand of workable tracked depth sees $1.7 million of 24-hour volume — a tape that turns over well beyond the pool, the signature of an actively routed asset.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GENIUS or LAB?
By tracked market cap: GENIUS (BNB Chain) measures $100.61M and LAB (BNB Chain) measures $34.69M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GENIUS or LAB?
On the contract checks we publish: GENIUS (BNB Chain) grades A and LAB (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GENIUS and LAB performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-10T21:13:10, the measured snapshots show GENIUS at −22.9% and LAB at −23.4%.
More comparisons
GENIUS vs HLXGENIUS vs WBTCGENIUS vs FETUSDC.E vs GENIUSFET vs LABWBTC vs LABHLX vs LABLAB vs STABLE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-10T21:13:10; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.