NexGALABET vs 果蝇 — price, size and safety, side by side
GALABET (BNB Chain) vs 果蝇 (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-11 / 2026-11-09.
GALABET vs 果蝇 — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-09T21:16:00
| GALABET | 果蝇 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0003274 | $0.000000000000 |
| Market cap | — | $7.83K |
| 24h volume | $20.82M DEX | $0.00 DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.19K | $5.51 |
| FDV | $9.805644351263989e+44T | $7.72K |
| Holders | 52,665 | 1,815,204 |
| Age (days) | 293 | 5 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- GALABET measures ~216× the liquidity of 果蝇
- 果蝇 measures ~34× the holder count of GALABET
What the data says
GALABET
GALABET CASINO is a BNB Chain token tied to the betting site that shares its name, deployed at 0x6d6521283cd3fd0188fe0408e700a5790a0f6c61. This snapshot is dated November 4, 2026, 278 days after the contract first appeared.
The measured shape is unusual: $1 thousand of tracked liquidity and 52,665 holders, yet $2.3 billion traded in the last day — turnover roughly twenty-four times the pool itself, a signature of market-maker flow rather than organic buying. The top-ten wallets hold 100.0% of supply, so the entire float sits in a handful of accounts.
果蝇
果蝇 — "fruit fly" in Chinese — at 0x209e487f1c2637ddf1f1b3f7d88a19068626b70b is a five-day-old BNB Chain deployment whose headline number demands a second look: 1,815,204 recorded wallets against a market cap of $7.8 thousand and a fully diluted figure of $8 thousand on the November 3, 2026 snapshot.
A holder count that large against a four-figure valuation is the signature of an airdrop-shaped distribution — dust scattered across hundreds of thousands of addresses, not organic demand — and the concentration read agrees: the top ten wallets hold 100% of the supply, so the 1.8 million "holders" carry amounts too small to matter. The tracked book, $5.5 of pool liquidity, is real but thin against the FDV.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GALABET or 果蝇?
By tracked market cap: GALABET (BNB Chain) measures — and 果蝇 (BNB Chain) measures $7.83K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GALABET or 果蝇?
On the contract checks we publish: GALABET (BNB Chain) grades B and 果蝇 (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GALABET and 果蝇 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-09T21:16:00, the measured snapshots show GALABET at −100.0% and 果蝇 at −100.0%.
More comparisons
GALABET vs NODAGALABET vs BNSOLGALABET vs JITOSOLGALABET vs JLUSDC果蝇 vs BNSOL果蝇 vs JITOSOL果蝇 vs JLUSDC果蝇 vs JUPSOL
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-09T21:16:00; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.