HostG vs MUSD — price, size and safety, side by side
G (Ethereum) vs MUSD (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
G vs MUSD — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| G | MUSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.005728 | $0.9984 |
| Market cap | $45.30M | $29.22M |
| 24h volume | $2.25M | $7.19M |
| Liquidity | $1.41M | $1.38M |
| FDV | $76.80M | $14.26M |
| Holders | 26,754 | 8,925 |
| Age (days) | 795 | 126 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- G measures ~1.6× the market cap of MUSD
- MUSD measures ~3.2× the 24h volume of G
- G measures ~3.0× the holder count of MUSD
- over the shared window G moved −8.55% while MUSD moved +0.05%
What the data says
G
G — "Gravity" on Ethereum, 0x9c7beba8f6ef6643abd725e45a4e8387ef260649 — is a single-letter ticker token carrying a $45.3 million market cap in the tracked book.
The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $1.4 million of liquidity, roughly $2.2 million of daily volume, at a $0.0063 unit price — daily turnover larger than the pool itself.
MUSD
MUSD — MetaMask's USD — is the wallet's own stablecoin: a dollar token aimed at the place its users already live, issued through the M0 infrastructure stack and meant to move between chains as one instrument. The deployment at 0xaca92e438df0b2401ff60da7e4337b687a2435da is on Monad, where our September 27, 2026 snapshot shows $1.4 million of tracked pool liquidity — among the deepest pools we measured on the chain.
What to be honest about: a wallet-issued stablecoin's strength is distribution — every MetaMask user is one tap from it — and its risk is concentration in the issuer's own stack. Backing, redemption and chain-deploy mechanics live with M0 and the contracts behind this address; our snapshot did not assess this deployment's contract-level controls, so the live scan is the place to verify before treating the label as the substance.
FAQ
Which is bigger, G or MUSD?
By tracked market cap: G (Ethereum) measures $45.30M and MUSD (Monad) measures $29.22M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, G or MUSD?
On the contract checks we publish: G (Ethereum) grades B and MUSD (Monad) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have G and MUSD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show G at −8.55% and MUSD at +0.05%.
More comparisons
ZCHF vs GBSDETH vs GTBTC vs GG vs MARSCOINMUSD vs LINKMARSCOIN vs MUSDZCHF vs MUSDBSDETH vs MUSD
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.