HostFUN vs TEL — price, size and safety, side by side
FUN (Polygon) vs TEL (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
FUN vs TEL — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T21:07:21
| FUN | TEL | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $8.02 | $0.001742 |
| Market cap | $303.44M | $172.16M |
| 24h volume | $27.72K | $253.82K |
| Liquidity | $2.75M | $1.43M |
| FDV | $336.65M | $67.12M |
| Holders | 31,222 | 35,353 |
| Age (days) | 106 | 327 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- FUN measures ~1.8× the market cap of TEL
- FUN measures ~1.9× the liquidity of TEL
- TEL measures ~9.2× the 24h volume of FUN
What the data says
FUN
FUN — deployed as FunPay on Polygon — is a 106-day-old payments-branded token at 0x7ee08c0fa1cb2a0ca40f309427d104a0d176eeb9, priced at a $303.4 million market cap against $2.8 million of tracked pool liquidity on the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
The ratio is the story: a nine-figure headline valuation resting on a seven-figure exit book means the price is set at the margin — a modest sell order can move it hard, and the page's own depth flag says so. Contract-level controls weren't evaluated in this snapshot, so mint, pause, and blacklist states stay open questions for the live scan rather than assumptions this page makes.
TEL
TEL at 0xdf7837de1f2fa4631d716cf2502f8b230f1dcc32 is Telcoin's remittance asset in its PoS-bridged Polygon form — the payments token aimed at telecom corridors, carried to the chain where its retail flow actually trades. The September 27, 2026 snapshot prices a $172.2 million asset-wide market cap against a $67.1 million fully-diluted read of the local float — 38.3 billion units sitting on this chain.
The book is honest mid-cap shape: $1.4 million of tracked pool depth is workable for the size, on $72.2 thousand of 24-hour volume — a working tape rather than a churn chart. The deployment is 327 days into this index's record.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FUN or TEL?
By tracked market cap: FUN (Polygon) measures $303.44M and TEL (Polygon) measures $172.16M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FUN or TEL?
On the contract checks we publish: FUN (Polygon) grades A and TEL (Polygon) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FUN and TEL performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T21:07:21, the measured snapshots show FUN at 0.00% and TEL at −0.81%.
More comparisons
MSETH vs FUNSOL vs FUNAUSD vs FUNFUN vs USDTTSLAX vs TELZEN vs TELATH vs TELTEL vs TBTC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T21:07:21; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.