HostFUN vs PLAY — price, size and safety, side by side
FUN (Polygon) vs PLAY (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
FUN vs PLAY — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| FUN | PLAY | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $8.02 | $0.03185 |
| Market cap | $303.44M | $11.67M |
| 24h volume | $27.72K | $1.06M |
| Liquidity | $2.75M | $301.30K |
| FDV | $336.65M | $124.98M |
| Holders | 31,222 | 6,454 |
| Age (days) | 106 | 140 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- FUN measures ~26× the market cap of PLAY
- FUN measures ~9.1× the liquidity of PLAY
- PLAY measures ~38× the 24h volume of FUN
- FUN measures ~4.8× the holder count of PLAY
- over the shared window FUN moved −9.92% while PLAY moved +2.06%
What the data says
FUN
FUN — deployed as FunPay on Polygon — is a 106-day-old payments-branded token at 0x7ee08c0fa1cb2a0ca40f309427d104a0d176eeb9, priced at a $303.4 million market cap against $2.8 million of tracked pool liquidity on the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
The ratio is the story: a nine-figure headline valuation resting on a seven-figure exit book means the price is set at the margin — a modest sell order can move it hard, and the page's own depth flag says so. Contract-level controls weren't evaluated in this snapshot, so mint, pause, and blacklist states stay open questions for the live scan rather than assumptions this page makes.
PLAY
PLAY at 0x853a7c99227499dba9db8c3a02aa691afdebf841 is a Base asset 140 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot. The $11.7 million market cap prices under a tenth of the $125.0 million fully-diluted figure on 5.0 billion units — the emission overhang dominates this book's shape.
The book is workable and the tape is hot: $301.3 thousand of tracked depth on $1.1 million of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling itself several times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FUN or PLAY?
By tracked market cap: FUN (Polygon) measures $303.44M and PLAY (Base) measures $11.67M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FUN or PLAY?
On the contract checks we publish: FUN (Polygon) grades A and PLAY (Base) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FUN and PLAY performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show FUN at −9.92% and PLAY at +2.06%.
More comparisons
MSETH vs FUNSOL vs FUNAUSD vs FUNUB vs FUNSHMON vs PLAYPLAY vs PYTHIAHNT vs PLAYPLAY vs ZRP
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.