NexFUN vs HYPE — price, size and safety, side by side
FUN (Polygon) vs HYPE (Unichain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-15.
FUN vs HYPE — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-11-15T15:15:30
| FUN | HYPE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $3.42 | $67.20 |
| Market cap | — | $61.18M |
| 24h volume | $19.94K DEX | $16.86M DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.97M | $5.64M |
| FDV | $172.10M | $10.26M |
| Holders | 31,265 | 4,400 |
| Age (days) | 121 | 423 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- HYPE measures ~2.9× the liquidity of FUN
- HYPE measures ~846× the 24h volume of FUN
- FUN measures ~7.1× the holder count of HYPE
- over the shared window FUN moved −40.0% while HYPE moved −21.1%
What the data says
FUN
FUN — deployed as FunPay on Polygon — is a 106-day-old payments-branded token at 0x7ee08c0fa1cb2a0ca40f309427d104a0d176eeb9, priced at a $172.1 million market cap against $2.0 million of tracked pool liquidity on the November 6, 2026 snapshot.
The ratio is the story: a nine-figure headline valuation resting on a seven-figure exit book means the price is set at the margin — a modest sell order can move it hard, and the page's own depth flag says so. Contract-level controls weren't evaluated in this snapshot, so mint, pause, and blacklist states stay open questions for the live scan rather than assumptions this page makes.
HYPE
There's a lot to like about how HYPE's contract is set up. There is no mint function for anyone to inflate the supply with, and no freeze-style control exists in the code, so your holdings stay liquid and movable. With the contract side handled, everything left to think about is ordinary market risk (100/100, 2026-10-09).
By the numbers, HYPE is showing $5.04M of on-chain liquidity, 4,400 holders and 423 days old as of 2026-10-09. The $5.04M pool stands up well to a ~$70.06M cap — depth like that means HYPE absorbs normal flow without the price lurching. 4,400 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. Reassuringly, the wallet that created HYPE holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FUN or HYPE?
By tracked market cap: FUN (Polygon) measures — and HYPE (Unichain) measures $61.18M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FUN or HYPE?
On the contract checks we publish: FUN (Polygon) grades A and HYPE (Unichain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FUN and HYPE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-11-15T15:15:30, the measured snapshots show FUN at −40.0% and HYPE at −21.1%.
More comparisons
SYRUPUSDC vs FUNFUN vs USDTCBETH vs FUNFUN vs USD0AERO vs HYPEHYPE vs SPXENA vs HYPEEUROC vs HYPE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-11-15T15:15:30; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.