HostFUN vs AMWBTC — price, size and safety, side by side
FUN (Polygon) vs AMWBTC (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-15.
FUN vs AMWBTC — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-15T15:15:30
| FUN | AMWBTC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $3.42 | $64.93K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $19.94K DEX | $19.42K DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.97M | $811.67K |
| FDV | $172.10M | $4.62M |
| Holders | 31,265 | 9,807 |
| Age (days) | 121 | 1,518 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- FUN measures ~2.4× the liquidity of AMWBTC
- FUN measures ~3.2× the holder count of AMWBTC
- over the shared window FUN moved −57.3% while AMWBTC moved −19.9%
What the data says
FUN
FUN — deployed as FunPay on Polygon — is a 106-day-old payments-branded token at 0x7ee08c0fa1cb2a0ca40f309427d104a0d176eeb9, priced at a $172.1 million market cap against $2.0 million of tracked pool liquidity on the November 6, 2026 snapshot.
The ratio is the story: a nine-figure headline valuation resting on a seven-figure exit book means the price is set at the margin — a modest sell order can move it hard, and the page's own depth flag says so. Contract-level controls weren't evaluated in this snapshot, so mint, pause, and blacklist states stay open questions for the live scan rather than assumptions this page makes.
AMWBTC
AMWBTC — Aave's Polygon-market WBTC receipt at 0x5c2ed810328349100a66b82b78a1791b101c9d61 — is not a token you buy so much as a receipt the Aave pool issued when someone deposited WBTC: it tracks a claim on the deposited bitcoin plus accrued interest, priced at $81,051 per unit on a 62-unit supply at the November 6, 2026 snapshot.
The profile fits a receipt token: an upgradeable proxy by design (Aave upgrades market logic behind the same addresses), verified source, $812 thousand of healthy depth, 9,807 holders, and 1,518 days of operation. The ten largest wallets hold about 53.4% of the tiny unit supply — expected, since the biggest depositors hold the most receipts.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FUN or AMWBTC?
By tracked market cap: FUN (Polygon) measures — and AMWBTC (Polygon) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FUN or AMWBTC?
On the contract checks we publish: FUN (Polygon) grades A and AMWBTC (Polygon) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FUN and AMWBTC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-15T15:15:30, the measured snapshots show FUN at −57.3% and AMWBTC at −19.9%.
More comparisons
SYRUPUSDC vs FUNFUN vs USDTCBETH vs FUNFUN vs USD0USDT0 vs AMWBTCAMWBTC vs USD₮0AMWBTC vs TBTCAKE vs AMWBTC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-15T15:15:30; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.