HostFUN vs AAVE — price, size and safety, side by side
FUN (Polygon) vs AAVE (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-13.
FUN vs AAVE — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-13T12:15:58
| FUN | AAVE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $3.42 | $113.88 |
| Market cap | — | $2.01B |
| 24h volume | $19.94K DEX | $303.80M all venues |
| Liquidity | $1.97M | $14.00M |
| FDV | $172.10M | $2.08B |
| Holders | 31,265 | — |
| Age (days) | 121 | 1,742 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- AAVE measures ~7.1× the liquidity of FUN
- AAVE measures ~15,232× the 24h volume of FUN
- over the shared window FUN moved −55.7% while AAVE moved −22.2%
What the data says
FUN
FUN — deployed as FunPay on Polygon — is a 106-day-old payments-branded token at 0x7ee08c0fa1cb2a0ca40f309427d104a0d176eeb9, priced at a $172.1 million market cap against $2.0 million of tracked pool liquidity on the November 6, 2026 snapshot.
The ratio is the story: a nine-figure headline valuation resting on a seven-figure exit book means the price is set at the margin — a modest sell order can move it hard, and the page's own depth flag says so. Contract-level controls weren't evaluated in this snapshot, so mint, pause, and blacklist states stay open questions for the live scan rather than assumptions this page makes.
AAVE
AAVE is the token of DeFi's biggest lending protocol — the asset that secures Aave's safety module and governs the money market that's been clearing loans continuously since ETHLend in 2017. The deployment 0x7fc66500c84a76ad7e9c93437bfc5ac33e2ddae9 is the canonical mint; our November 6, 2026 snapshot reads $14.0 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — thin against a float that trades everywhere.
The honest shape: AAVE's thesis is unusually concrete for a governance token — stakers backstop protocol shortfalls with their own stake, so the token is literally collateral for the system's solvency, which ties its value to Aave's actual revenue and risk book rather than pure governance vibes. That makes it closer to a productive asset than most of this index — with the caveat that "productive" here still means "exposed to one protocol's loan book."
FAQ
Which is bigger, FUN or AAVE?
By tracked market cap: FUN (Polygon) measures — and AAVE (Ethereum) measures $2.01B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FUN or AAVE?
On the contract checks we publish: FUN (Polygon) grades A and AAVE (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FUN and AAVE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-13T12:15:58, the measured snapshots show FUN at −55.7% and AAVE at −22.2%.
More comparisons
SYRUPUSDC vs FUNFUN vs USDTCBETH vs FUNFUN vs USD0AAVE vs USDGU vs AAVEUSD1 vs AAVEXAUT vs AAVE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-13T12:15:58; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.