HostFRAX vs MIM — price, size and safety, side by side
FRAX (Avalanche) vs MIM (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
FRAX vs MIM — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| FRAX | MIM | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9996 | $0.0278 |
| Market cap | $219.23M | $212.99K |
| 24h volume | $27.77K | $49.67K |
| Liquidity | $128.59K | $100.62K |
| FDV | $620.92K | $212.98K |
| Holders | 10,091 | 99,947 |
| Age (days) | 1,399 | 1,820 |
| Safety grade | C | D |
Where they differ
- FRAX measures ~1,029× the market cap of MIM
- MIM measures ~1.8× the 24h volume of FRAX
- MIM measures ~9.9× the holder count of FRAX
- over the shared window FRAX moved −11.6% while MIM moved −72.0%
What the data says
FRAX
FRAX at 0xd24c2ad096400b6fbcd2ad8b24e7acbc21a1da64 is the Avalanche deployment of Frax's dollar token, 1,399 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $219.2 million market cap dwarfs a $620.9 thousand fully-diluted figure priced on 621.1 thousand local units.
The local book is thin and the tape quiet: $128.6 thousand of tracked depth on $9.6 thousand of 24-hour volume — a held slice. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
MIM
MIM — Magic Internet Money — is Abracadabra’s collateral-backed stablecoin, the asset that rode the 2021 leverage wave and has been shrinking toward the noise floor since. The Avalanche deployment at 0x130966628846bfd36ff31a822705796e8cb8c18d is one of the many chain homes left from the era when it went everywhere.
Our September 27, 2026 snapshot tells the story in numbers: a $213.0 thousand market cap ($213.0 thousand fully-diluted on the 7.4 million tokens here), 99,947 holders still carrying the remainder, $100.6 thousand of pool liquidity that reads deep only because the market cap fell to meet it, and $46.1 thousand traded in the last day. The token is 1,820 days old.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FRAX or MIM?
By tracked market cap: FRAX (Avalanche) measures $219.23M and MIM (Avalanche) measures $212.99K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FRAX or MIM?
On the contract checks we publish: FRAX (Avalanche) grades C and MIM (Avalanche) grades D. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FRAX and MIM performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show FRAX at −11.6% and MIM at −72.0%.
More comparisons
ALTSZN vs FRAXFRAX vs RFCEVAA vs FRAXKET vs FRAXLUNA vs MIMMIM vs AMCDONT vs MIMMIM vs AMIKO
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.