HostFRAX vs GOHM — price, size and safety, side by side
FRAX (Avalanche) vs GOHM (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
FRAX vs GOHM — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| FRAX | GOHM | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9996 | $5.53K |
| Market cap | $219.23M | — |
| 24h volume | $27.77K | $3.54K |
| Liquidity | $128.59K | $116.22K |
| FDV | $620.92K | $3.42M |
| Holders | 10,091 | 7,457 |
| Age (days) | 1,399 | 1,758 |
| Safety grade | C | C |
Where they differ
- FRAX measures ~7.8× the 24h volume of GOHM
- over the shared window FRAX moved −11.6% while GOHM moved +1.00%
What the data says
FRAX
FRAX at 0xd24c2ad096400b6fbcd2ad8b24e7acbc21a1da64 is the Avalanche deployment of Frax's dollar token, 1,399 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $219.2 million market cap dwarfs a $620.9 thousand fully-diluted figure priced on 621.1 thousand local units.
The local book is thin and the tape quiet: $128.6 thousand of tracked depth on $9.6 thousand of 24-hour volume — a held slice. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
GOHM
GOHM — Governance OHM — is the wrapped-governance form of Olympus's OHM, and it is one of the oldest assets in this batch: 1,758 days on the September 27, 2026 snapshot, at 0x321e7092a180bb43555132ec53aaa65a5bf84251 on Avalanche.
The numbers need their unit context: a per-token price of $5,479.54 across a supply of 621 pieces prices a market cap of $3.4 million, against $116.2 thousand of tracked liquidity — a thin but proportional book for a vestige asset. GOHM inherits its risk twice: the wrapper contract and the rebasing OHM underneath it, and this snapshot didn't evaluate contract-level controls.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FRAX or GOHM?
By tracked market cap: FRAX (Avalanche) measures $219.23M and GOHM (Avalanche) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FRAX or GOHM?
On the contract checks we publish: FRAX (Avalanche) grades C and GOHM (Avalanche) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FRAX and GOHM performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show FRAX at −11.6% and GOHM at +1.00%.
More comparisons
ALTSZN vs FRAXFRAX vs RFCEVAA vs FRAXKET vs FRAXGOHM vs XERISTRUMAN vs GOHMGOHM vs KOHAIFRIC vs GOHM
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.