HostFINGER vs BLAST — price, size and safety, side by side
FINGER (Blast) vs BLAST (Blast) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-27 / 2026-10-27.
FINGER vs BLAST — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-27T12:16:05
| FINGER | BLAST | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00000001847 | $0.000003415 |
| Market cap | — | $2.64M |
| 24h volume | $7.03 DEX | $4.12K DEX |
| Liquidity | $9.32K | $4.52K |
| FDV | $13.98K | $3.72M |
| Holders | 4,273 | 279,524 |
| Age (days) | 953 | 836 |
| Safety grade | A | C |
Where they differ
- FINGER measures ~2.1× the liquidity of BLAST
- BLAST measures ~586× the 24h volume of FINGER
- BLAST measures ~65× the holder count of FINGER
- over the shared window FINGER moved −8.36% while BLAST moved −90.8%
What the data says
FINGER
Start with the good news — FINGER's contract is clean on the risks that matter. The contract cannot mint new supply, so the float can't be diluted, and no freeze-style control exists in the code, so your holdings stay liquid and movable. That leaves FINGER at a healthy 85/100 as of 2026-10-09, with only normal market risk left to price in.
On liquidity and holders, FINGER shows thin liquidity of $9.32K, a holder base of 4,273 and 953 days old as of 2026-10-09. Treat $9.32K as the room your trade has to work in — the smaller the pool relative to your size, the more your own order moves the price. A 4,273-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. Reassuringly, the wallet that created FINGER holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
BLAST
One thing stands out on BLAST, and it's worth knowing up front. As of the 2026-10-09 read, the contract's mint function hasn't been removed, leaving the deployer able to create new supply for now. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why BLAST is at C (60/100) as of 2026-10-09, with real room to improve.
Market-wise, BLAST carries a $4.52K pool, 279,524 wallets holding and an established record at 836 days as of 2026-10-09. Weigh the $4.52K pool against a ~$2.64M cap and one thing stands out — it's a slim pool for the size, so BLAST's price is easier to move than its market cap implies, and large size should scale in and out patiently. A holder base of 279,524 is reassuring too — counts like that are difficult to fake and point to real, spread-out ownership rather than a few concentrated hands. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FINGER or BLAST?
By tracked market cap: FINGER (Blast) measures — and BLAST (Blast) measures $2.64M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FINGER or BLAST?
On the contract checks we publish: FINGER (Blast) grades A and BLAST (Blast) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FINGER and BLAST performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-27T12:16:05, the measured snapshots show FINGER at −8.36% and BLAST at −90.8%.
More comparisons
FINGER vs WEETHCAKE vs FINGERFINGER vs RETHFINGER vs BNSOLBLAST vs RETHWEETH vs BLASTBLAST vs BNSOLBLAST vs JITOSOL
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-27T12:16:05; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.