HostFF vs LINK — price, size and safety, side by side
FF (BNB Chain) vs LINK (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-11 / 2026-11-13.
FF vs LINK — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-11T18:19:14
| FF | LINK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.08725 | $9.97 |
| Market cap | $329.65M | $8.23B |
| 24h volume | $3.93M all venues | $370.50M all venues |
| Liquidity | $152.88K | $21.04M |
| FDV | $34.75M | $10.74B |
| Holders | 27,928 | 922,570 |
| Age (days) | 359 | 1,745 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- LINK measures ~25× the market cap of FF
- LINK measures ~138× the liquidity of FF
- LINK measures ~94× the 24h volume of FF
- LINK measures ~33× the holder count of FF
- over the shared window FF moved −31.8% while LINK moved −19.9%
What the data says
FF
FF at 0xac23b90a79504865d52b49b327328411a23d4db2 — Falcon Finance — is a 359-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $329.6 million asset-wide market cap against a $34.7 million fully-diluted figure priced on 488.7 million local units at the November 6, 2026 snapshot.
The local book is thin for the headline and the tape is loud: $152.9 thousand of tracked depth on $6.2 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool seven times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
LINK
LINK is Chainlink's token — the asset that pays the oracle network most of DeFi runs on, making it one of the few crypto tokens tied to infrastructure the market actually uses every block. The deployment 0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca is the canonical mint; our November 6, 2026 snapshot reads $21.0 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — a fraction of a float spread across every venue that lists it.
The honest shape: LINK's value thesis is payment for oracle services plus stake in the network's security model, so it carries a real-usage floor most tokens lack — and a valuation that has always run ahead of the fees the network actually collects. It is infrastructure exposure, not a cashflow claim, and the gap between "most-used oracle" and "token captures that usage" is the open question its holders are betting on.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FF or LINK?
By tracked market cap: FF (BNB Chain) measures $329.65M and LINK (Ethereum) measures $8.23B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FF or LINK?
On the contract checks we publish: FF (BNB Chain) grades B and LINK (Ethereum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FF and LINK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-11T18:19:14, the measured snapshots show FF at −31.8% and LINK at −19.9%.
More comparisons
FF vs CATZRO vs FFETHFI vs FFGRASS vs FFLINK vs CIRBTCLINK vs SUSDELINK vs VVVLINK vs PAXG
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-11T18:19:14; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.