HostFET vs METH — price, size and safety, side by side
FET (Ethereum) vs METH (Mantle) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-27 / 2026-10-27.
FET vs METH — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-27T12:16:05
| FET | METH | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.176 | $2.53K |
| Market cap | $510.23M | $583.84M |
| 24h volume | $410.32K DEX | $122.93K DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.69M | $1.65M |
| FDV | $599.16M | $76.78M |
| Holders | 165,300 | 16,954 |
| Age (days) | 1,388 | 883 |
| Safety grade | D | B |
Where they differ
- FET measures ~3.3× the 24h volume of METH
- FET measures ~9.7× the holder count of METH
- over the shared window FET moved −20.3% while METH moved −7.78%
What the data says
FET
FET — 0xaea46a60368a7bd060eec7df8cba43b7ef41ad85 — is Fetch.ai's token, mid-merger: Fetch, SingularityNET and Ocean Protocol are combining into the Artificial Superintelligence Alliance (ASI), with FET as the merge's surviving ticker at the first stage. Holding this contract today means holding an asset whose own alliance is re-denominating it — liquidity, branding and mindshare are all in transit.
The October 9, 2026 snapshot reads a $510.2 million market cap against an $599.2 million FDV — most supply circulating — with $1.7 million of tracked pool depth and 165,300 holders. Workable depth for a mid-cap, though the market's real center of gravity sits on centralized venues during the migration.
METH
One detail on METH didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Market-wise, METH carries a $1.65M pool, 16,954 holders and 883 days old as of 2026-10-09. Against a market cap near $583.84M, that $1.65M of liquidity is the real constraint here: a pool this shallow relative to the cap makes slippage, not the contract, the thing to plan around. A 16,954-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. Reassuringly, the wallet that created METH holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FET or METH?
By tracked market cap: FET (Ethereum) measures $510.23M and METH (Mantle) measures $583.84M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FET or METH?
On the contract checks we publish: FET (Ethereum) grades D and METH (Mantle) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FET and METH performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-27T12:16:05, the measured snapshots show FET at −20.3% and METH at −7.78%.
More comparisons
FET vs SYRUPUSDCFET vs MONLIT vs FETMORPHO vs FETSYRUPUSDC vs METHMETH vs MONMETH vs ONDOLIT vs METH
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-27T12:16:05; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.